I cringed so hard reading this post, subtlily attacking dan so that OP appears to be to the victim, rambling irrelevant stuff while completely avoiding the real accusations ( excessive whales upvotes and your content is not worth the money)
Reading this thread I’m shoked by the naivety of steemians who buy this bullshit
I am just a user, not an early miner, nor a witness, my involvement in Steemit came with posting.
And whales consistently upvoted your shitty cannabis post which you also ended with some crappy youtube video. It doesn’t take a genius to know that you are a whale upvoting yourself,no one has ever received so much support from whales for posting garbage beside masteryoda which was probably a whale too. Your charts are also upvoted by hundreds of sock puppets accounts badger1,badger2,badger3,etc..you wouldn't have to do that if your charts were really popular as you claim You are a Liar @ozchartart, @ozmaster which is your other account also got huge support from whales for posting rubbish cannabis reviews
$4000 for a fucking cannabis pic https://steemit.com/marijuana/@ozmaster/today-s-smoke
I find it hilarious that @dan started upvoting you after this post when you made a pure mockery out of everyone especially him.
This fiasco you colluders have done over the lifespan of steemit is despicable.You can add me to the list as well @berniesanders - I as well flagged this post.
If all you are going to do with your steempower is to upvote yourself and your sockpuppets, then ... Well I wont say what is on my mind, you should all be ashamed of yourself.
It is immoral, it is unethical and what you bad whales do completely lack business-sense. Break down, Confess and Repent from your sins!
Take a look at my votes and you'll see the real story. Plenty of claims here with 0 data to back them up even though it's readily available on the blockchain. @curie does 99% of my voting with 0 input from me.
I did take a look at your voting after I read this comment and I just saw this post and @barrydutton's comment and I have to admit that I really thought @ozchartart was @berniesanders or there was at least collusion. After reading all this, I will no longer flag @ozchartart. I don't think you are profiting off of these posts except for the curation reward of course and honestly if you are, after all the other voting you do, I don't even care. I think these flag wars are bad for Steemit. If we are going to use flags this way, we should call them downvotes and we should always consider if someone has found the content valuable.
I know he doesn't. He has voted pretty consistently on my posts and even resteemed one of them. I'm grateful for his support and think he does a great job of curating a lot of authors to help out the community.
Flagged as trolling. As Dan indicated to you on the other post, you can express your views without attacking people and name calling. I would say the same to Dan, but your hostility is even worse.
Well @smooth & @berniesanders - I am from a place of pure raw talk and raw violence, as you may know. So I am new to all this "non aggression principle" you seem to try to practice around here and I am open to learn.
Should we start a blank page and progress, or should we keep filling up the phonebook of accusations from the past?
The last war I was in had casualties on both sides (real life) - so I am all for peace if we can have it - and from what I see the two of you are what is standing stubbornly against peace and causing all this friction, so my question to you two is - will you come to the roundtable or do you want to keep going in the same direction?
I can't speak for anyone else but I personally have no ongoing conflict with you and I'm happy to discuss anything with you or anyone at any time on steemit.chat, as I have in the past.
The above is an instance of flaming in an attempt to win influence from anyone watching the conflict and has to be pointed out from time to time even when one can't easily pick a side or stance on a specific issue.
upvoted to counter the autodownvote
Just to be clear, I have no auto down vote on these posts.
It wasn't yours, and I wasn't referring to the post but to the comment
I cringed so hard reading this post, subtlily attacking dan so that OP appears to be to the victim, rambling irrelevant stuff while completely avoiding the real accusations ( excessive whales upvotes and your content is not worth the money)
Reading this thread I’m shoked by the naivety of steemians who buy this bullshit
And whales consistently upvoted your shitty cannabis post which you also ended with some crappy youtube video. It doesn’t take a genius to know that you are a whale upvoting yourself,no one has ever received so much support from whales for posting garbage beside masteryoda which was probably a whale too. Your charts are also upvoted by hundreds of sock puppets accounts badger1,badger2,badger3,etc..you wouldn't have to do that if your charts were really popular as you claim
You are a Liar @ozchartart, @ozmaster which is your other account also got huge support from whales for posting rubbish cannabis reviews $4000 for a fucking cannabis pic https://steemit.com/marijuana/@ozmaster/today-s-smoke I find it hilarious that @dan started upvoting you after this post when you made a pure mockery out of everyone especially him.
Calm down, mate.
You just stated that you're aware it's a shared account, so how do you even know you're talking to the person who said that shit?
Chill.
FYI @anonymous who flagged this post is @xeroc
This fiasco you colluders have done over the lifespan of steemit is despicable.You can add me to the list as well @berniesanders - I as well flagged this post.
If all you are going to do with your steempower is to upvote yourself and your sockpuppets, then ... Well I wont say what is on my mind, you should all be ashamed of yourself.
It is immoral, it is unethical and what you bad whales do completely lack business-sense. Break down, Confess and Repent from your sins!
#istandwithdan #istandwithned #istandwithsteemitinc #wewin
hey berniesanders upvoted me 1 time ... maybe twice? so perhaps he doesn't just vote his own sockpuppets? :)
Take a look at my votes and you'll see the real story. Plenty of claims here with 0 data to back them up even though it's readily available on the blockchain. @curie does 99% of my voting with 0 input from me.
i do, i always see you voting on a bunch of peeps stuff! :)
I did take a look at your voting after I read this comment and I just saw this post and @barrydutton's comment and I have to admit that I really thought @ozchartart was @berniesanders or there was at least collusion. After reading all this, I will no longer flag @ozchartart. I don't think you are profiting off of these posts except for the curation reward of course and honestly if you are, after all the other voting you do, I don't even care. I think these flag wars are bad for Steemit. If we are going to use flags this way, we should call them downvotes and we should always consider if someone has found the content valuable.
I know he doesn't. He has voted pretty consistently on my posts and even resteemed one of them. I'm grateful for his support and think he does a great job of curating a lot of authors to help out the community.
yes he does support a wide variety if you take the time to notice!
and also thanks @berniesanders for past support !
Flagged as trolling. As Dan indicated to you on the other post, you can express your views without attacking people and name calling. I would say the same to Dan, but your hostility is even worse.
Well @smooth & @berniesanders - I am from a place of pure raw talk and raw violence, as you may know. So I am new to all this "non aggression principle" you seem to try to practice around here and I am open to learn.
Should we start a blank page and progress, or should we keep filling up the phonebook of accusations from the past?
The last war I was in had casualties on both sides (real life) - so I am all for peace if we can have it - and from what I see the two of you are what is standing stubbornly against peace and causing all this friction, so my question to you two is - will you come to the roundtable or do you want to keep going in the same direction?
I can't speak for anyone else but I personally have no ongoing conflict with you and I'm happy to discuss anything with you or anyone at any time on steemit.chat, as I have in the past.
I am not trolling, so you can unflag it. I really mean it - you included should in company with the other collusion whales be ashamed of your actions.
Don´t you think we have a copy of every bad things you guys have said about everyone on rocket.chat and other places?
Your Power-Abusive behaviour is the problem - how come you do not understand that King Smooth and King NextGenCrypto etc etc...?
Not Trolling!
You're flaming quite often. Clearly. This has to be pointed out from time to time even when I can't pick a side in a specific conflict.
If you've got a copy, please share it. Don't just talk your usual talk to get everyone riled up.
Likewise, but I think many would be interested in the things you've said compared to either @smooth or myself.
You apparently do not understand how to engage in a reasoned conversation without making attacks and false accusations.
I don't know what language that is exactly but it looks vaguely like a false accusation and a personal attack against me.
Please learn to communicate without trolling and attacking people
The above is an instance of flaming in an attempt to win influence from anyone watching the conflict and has to be pointed out from time to time even when one can't easily pick a side or stance on a specific issue.