Didn't understand your question... I'm talking exactly about the size of the photo (in terms of resolution), or are you referring to size as in KB?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Didn't understand your question... I'm talking exactly about the size of the photo (in terms of resolution), or are you referring to size as in KB?
Right yes, my bad i did mean what size in KB
Well, having a smaller image size in terms of width and height, like 800x480 for example, essentially does result in not having a large in terms of file size image, so that should not be a problem. If publishing photos and you want to have a higher- resolution version, you just link the smaller image to a high-res version, so that when it is clicked om it will open the larger version in a new window.
Awesome thanks for the advice
To optimize the loading of your images on the web try to keep them under 600 ko and all will be fine.