it could be another share, say 30% or 10%,
dont you think its reasonable and fair that a person that its extracting money from sympathy to stray animals contributes a share to the issue that drives the attention to the post?
You can see in the comments that people that vote for it really just have sympathy for stray animals and support it, thats the spirit of the post, what she says is in such a broken English that nobody can really understand clearly
and most people probably dont even read it.
Im glad at least you appreciate what Im trying to do. Most people dont.