So we are both on the same side (assuming that you really are concerned about the good of the platform). That gives us a huge thing in common. We could even become friends once we get over what might turn out to be merely a misunderstanding. Since you are motivated by concern for the platform, as am I, neither one of us are cancer cells. So let's build on that welcome discovery.
I did not call the blogger a whore. I said that the behavior that he/she was advocating, artfully and with much humor, BTW, constituted whoring. "Social intercourse whoring", to be specific. I stand by that statement. If you have sexual intercourse for money or other gain, you are a whore (or a gigolo). If you engage in social intercourse for money or other gain, you are metaphorically also a whore.
That is what I said. It is my opinion. I wasn't aware that there were "valid alternative POV" police here on steemit. I wasn't aware that you had been appointed to determine which POV's are valid and which are not. Pardon me for not seeing your badge.
You've already admitted that you flagged me to censor me. I respect you for being honest about your intentions. Please reconsider whether it really is good for the platform for us to have "valid alternative POV" police in our midst, ready to flag to oblivion any expression of an opinion that is deemed to not be valid.