@angelro - Yeah, I was active on HHG 4, but my time is over. I had an input to make, and that's what I did. I then saw through the implementation. But, I had a leadership role - I am not the leader. I have a problem with people in life like politicians, who have a leadership role, then just take over...lol!
ON THE TOPIC -12
Correct, many social media platforms don't have any value for the user's. Perhaps just for a handful. But it is really destructive to your life balance. even my whatsapp is on need to do basis. sometimes i only look at messages days later (shameful I know). But for me right now quality of life is very important.
Hai Dear @rlt47...
Why are you thinking your time is over but I am again seeing you so active here too and Keep it up. And when we were talking about the leadership in Steemit why you tend to compare it with political leadership. They are in fact special creatures with registered trade marks such as skin power and making a fool out of their electorates..hehehe..
ON THE TOPIC 12
I am happy I was never ever active into FB, see what unethical things they had done now to the millions of users world wide. But for me it was saving lots of time too which I might had used productively. Even whatsup I again agree with you. Even I prefer to visit a close friend once in a week rather that talking over phone everyday, that makes more intimacy...
I think to make an effective work life balance one should reduce the amount of time spends in FB, Insta etc...
@angelro - I was more active on HHG 4 because I was commenting and managing the changes. yes I don't tend to to distinguish between leadership roles. In principle it can always be exploited no matter how insignificant it is.
Ok...Carry on depends on your prerogatives and preferences...We would always look forward with someone like you, not only in steemit HHG but on that process if something positives can be taken out of it that too be an advantage..