I don't have a problem with your point of view, I take issue with the idea that you are the only one who gets the real picture.
Why would anyone with stake want to hold stake so that bloggers could trade blogs?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is a blogging platform, intended to reward 'good' content creators.
I get that to get it off the ground investors, and roi, were needed to build excitement and expedite adoption, but those days will end.
The way i see it, nobody should invest more than 100mv, about 100k usd, at this point.
Using more stake than that disadvantages the small fry, making the game less attractive to the masses.
Maybe if my side of the equation wasnt sooo lonely, i would adopt a more genial attitude, but as things are not enough folks are expressing their discontent with the status quo, imo.
I could be wrong, but where is the change if so many folks recognize the problems?
The blockchain is a DPOS - delegated proof of stake. I acknowledge there are issues.
However, SteemIt, Inc made clear a long time ago that it is the blockchain project they are interested in, not the blogging site. In fact they have said many times if someone wants to build a better blogging site, they should.
I got on board with that idea, because it is what we are going to get. I am just pointing out the way you see it isn't fact, it is a point of view.
The blogging is the point of this blockchain.
If all they want is a blockchain to run bank accounts, what are they doing here?
Why did they run off Dan?
He was building a blogging site, afaik.
Id think it easier to start from scratch than to push the bloggers off of this chain.
Something isnt sitting square with this.