edb1984 - thank you for your comment!! I truly feel bullied right now and attacked because I really am not interested in child pornography and never was. The upvote on that image was simply because I didn't assume that this was child pornography as it didn't look like it... :(
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It is unfortunate that people are so quick to grab their pitchforks. We are after all, very emotional creatures and sometimes the emotions can let us act without proper perspective and foresight.
I am also very glad @edb1984 posted this, so that more people can be exposed to the notion, that most of the upvotes do not come from the enjoyment of the content that is of concern, but of innocent quick votes that come from people who are just casually browsing, or followers of the person in question.
He was wrong, I just responded to his bs.
@TheRealWolf You up-voted Child Pornography period. You are not being bullied you should not be using Steemit to up vote Child Pornography. That image "Helping Daddy with Dinner" was of a clearly underage girl who was in a thong.
I mean what did you think it was you sick fuck? Get the fuck off my blog and get the fuck into therapy. People like you make me sick.
And again - the explicit picture I upvoted was not child porn. It was an image with a caption. What a hypocrite are you to tell me that I need therapy? You're an asshole and a bully.
It was child porn you sick fuck.
Nope. It was not.
This is the picture @titusfrost is referring to.
https://steemit.com/photography/@iamgod/helping-daddy-with-dinner
Anyone can judge for themselves. (It's not child porn, feel free to click).
That is not child porn? It is a picture of an underage girl in a thong marked NSFW. Just as I said it was.
Please elaborate on how an underage girl posing in a thong marked NSFW is not what I said it was?
Do you think it is acceptable to post images of underage girls in lingerie? If that was your daughter would you find the spreading of that material acceptable? I hope not.
It seems to me that you're alone in thinking that the picture linked to in this thread of comments is what you claim it is. I looked at it and I have to agree that there's absolutely no way to know whether she's "under-aged" or not.
She could easily be 18 or 19 years old. How, in your right mind, can you feel justified in vilifying a person, completely ruining his reputation, on the basis of unreasonably assuming that the girl in this photo is younger than 18?
Can you at least explain for us how you're so sure that she's under-aged? I mean, you can't even see her face.
You do not have conclusive evidence that the girl is underage. She could easily be 18 or older.
She is not nude, the image itself is not sexualized at all, merely the title and tag creates sexual context. This is not sufficient to be deemed pornography.
And she could just easily under 16. At the very possible least, this some sexist, creepy bs. You shouldn't go around taking pics of girls and adding disgusting captions. People who do this know exactly what they are doing. As do those us fighting against it. If you don't want to appear to be peddling pedophilia, stop pushing it. Nobody wants see your horndog kid pics. They will all get reported as WE ARE NOT WILLING TAKE THAT RISK FOR YOU.
There is an enormous gap between "sexist, creepy bs" and criminal paedophilia. One will lose you some social capital, the other puts you in jail for a long time.
Not without proof. There's the wrench in your giddyup.
She doesn't even look underage. I wouldn't even call that porn! It's a grown womans bum, not in any way erotic!