Also, it is funny how sport events are being flagged by someone. Let's be honest, those were rage flags, having nothing to do with the articles. I cannot comment on nothing else, but my work. I spent 2 hours writing a review of Zalgiris-Olimpia game. Everythin what was predicted ended up to be true - Zalgiris won by 8 points (I said it will win by 3-8 points). I can almost guarantee that following my advices on those games and betting on the outcome, would make you earn some money. That's how much I know about my field.
You won't get much more quality reviews on games as you do on SteemSports, people... I get paid to write about basketball, and I spend my time to write it on Steemit as well. That personal Vendetta against some imaginary problems only hurt me and my editor - the ones who spent time and knowledge to creat high quality posts in sports world (anyone who is into sports, tell me that I am wrong). Funny, isn't it?
Hey my friend :) I don't think that people would ever take issue with high quality articles such as you would most definitely write. It seems that part of this was a misunderstanding, but also @beanz has been raising some issues that are not about the content of the games, but rather what these games are doing to the voting power overall, at least from what I understand of it. This is her most recent article: https://steemit.com/vote-buying/@beanz/the-judging-panel-and-how-they-keep-the-game-fun-for-everyone But I would certainly be willing to hear others weigh in on how her information is inaccurate. Though she is not the only one to bring this up, it's becoming a bit of a theme.