Thanks a lot for this series. Without it, I think that I would have never read anything about the Nobel prize in chemistry. For some reason, this part was much easy to get than the first one (although both were pleasant to read, don't worry), and I have no question (except the jokes I have left through the other comments)!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks. It’s very useful to hear that this entry was easier to understand so I appreciate the comment. I’ll have to keep in mind what I did to make it Moreno accessible.
Just updated my above comment: Nobel prize in chemistry, not physics :D
The research has nothing to do with chemistry anyways so the mistake is understandable :P
But chemistry is the most reasonable field in which to classify those researches, isn't it?
I suppose you could make an argument for this belonging in Physiology or Medicine, but chemistry often goes to molecular biology discoveries so its a bit of a toss up.
I won't argue with the Nobel committees... ;)