They basically were trying to hold the stake hostage so they could do what they wanted with it.
At least it showed the extreme level of naivety that the 'collective' witnesses possess.
Not being one to say 'I told you so...'
but....lmao.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I feel you. Was a 'pretty wise move' thinking they could actually get away with it.
let me get your opinion on this:
should they have burned all the Neon Green stake immediately?
This means nothing to me, soz...link?
Neon Green was a designation of the particular premined stake owned by steemit inc.
aggroed made the classification in this post
https://steemit.com/witness/@aggroed/teach-the-controversy-softfork-0-22-2-stop-and-correct-potential-futures
ok cheers, that makes things a bit clearer.
I still don't know the answer to your question, though.
I think if the genuine intention was to decentralize, the system wouldn't have been set up like it was, in the first place.
Oligarchical, as opposed to representative, for example (not thought it through, so can't really expand too much, and on my first coffee).