Occam's razor would ordinarily be my go to point but in this case it just doesn't add up.
The stones are too hard and brittle to have been worked in the way suggested, the people who academics say built the site didn't have any metallurgy anywhere else, the site is at 12,000ft way above the tree line therefore no logs were available to move the stone which came from up to 60k away and they didn't have the wheel!
Sorry buddy, Something else going on here.
Cheers for reading.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: