i do not believe the crown owns the land at all my friend. The tribes can say that the land is theirs and has been for thousands of years - that will hold up in any court - i believe the crown will push to own the land in full allodium through the use of force, violence and coercion - in so doing removing all rights that the tribes have to their sovereignty.
The crown can say that they acquired the land that had no landowner. They can also say that the treaty was for the land. If the natives make a claim it's tantamount to a homeless person declaring themselves landlord of the city. If the crown resorts to violence, coercion and force the natives could say "you're nothing without your thugs and your aggression, this is clearly unlawful", and if the crown ultimately does that they have demonstrated that they are indeed only thugs.
In feudal law if you do not hold property ie land, then you are a simple serf and can not be a "freeman", that is why non Crown land in Scotland is being sold by the inch...
In reality it doesn't matter what "equity" you "hodl", all men are begot Free, wars have been fought and won to establish that, again and again and again.
it's all about forcing the free into slavery, and the crown will take the land inch by inch if they can.
If the crown doesn't already own the land then why are people paying taxes on their property?
A: The Queen is the Ultimate Owner of the Land, both in Canada and the rest of the UK
http://www.whoownstheworld.com/canada/
Bankruptcy is a meaningless word to the crown / Vatican as wealth is not measured in fiat but in the land and people they own.
How can you dismiss bankruptcy, do you understand that it means all that they own is owed to others because they went bankrupt/cannot make good on their debts? Bankruptcy is what says if you can keep all that land, and about owning people I am sure that no Court on this Globe will uphold owning another human being.
The plan of domination by the crown is a complicated issue in itself, and this debate is about the Treaty violations committed by the Crown, so keeping this on topic i would disagree with the creation of any form of government by the tribes, and instead have a decentralised way of dealing with issues, that way no small group can sign away the rights of the many. Peace to you my friend :)
When I said they can have any kind of government you assumed that I meant centralized power that signs away other's rights, which isn't what government always is or what it always becomes, government can be by consent, within it's limitations and in good faith, and can be "decentralized" in method as well, yet ultimately government is a tool used to reach consensus and nothing more.
The crown have already used force and violence against the tribes and have already said the land belongs to them, just because the crown has said "it's mine", doesn't make it so - these actions have shown that they are nothing more than thugs.
There are no free men fighting in any army, all those that take up arms, are expendable slaves, and i respectfully disagree that wars are fought for freedom. Most wars are instigated by politicians/elite and are rooted in gaining resources, their greed is the driver for conflict, and is not the will of the people. [Also it is a way to remove Alpha males from the population decreasing the risk of an up-rising / civil war]
The queen holds the land in leu until an heir from god comes forth. She owns the people through words used by the people to describe themselves, ie British subject, human, person, citizen and honorary title like Mr. It has taken hundreds of years for the use of these words to become part of common everyday language, check out my brainwashed blog...
Even the best democratic government with honest intentions means that 49% of the people have no voice. And i respectfully disagree that you are governed by consent. Try and opt out... Try and say that their acts and statutes do not apply to you...Try and say you no longer wish to support their violence and wars by paying TAX. -
When you are aware that you are not human, then the complexity of the lie may fall into place - peace to you @baah, and thank you for the reply :)