Thank you for your submission. I would like to guide you to improve the quality of your contributions and inform about expectations of the category.
Even though we welcome contributions to MadAnalysis through exercises @lemouth shares, contributions in the category still should be based on editorial content with good presentation. Considering that blog posts are expected to promote the projects, they need to contain more than code and analysis reports to really add value to the project as a blog post.
Even though I appreciate all the contributions to MadAnalysis project as a science lover, the content should be revised to fit the category.
The first possible improvement would be referring to files in a repository instead of bulk sharing the code or output in the files. Then text to code ratio could be optimized for a good presentation. And beside these, using blogging language for providing an overview would increase the quality without a doubt.
While preparing your future contributions, please do not forget that these post are meant to promote the project in their own ways.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Hi, thank you for your review.
I note all your points.
I'm still unfamiliar with the format of posts under utopian-io/blog.
I'll have a look at other posts in this category to get a better idea.
I guess the intention behind adding the output of the program to the post was to allow @lemouth to spot quickly mistakes in the implementation. In the future I can commit a file to the repository with the output of the program.
The files added to github are at the beginning of the post.
Cheers.