You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Suggestion for eSteem Surfer: Improvements to the user search feature

in #utopian-io6 years ago

Thank you for asking questions! I am more than happy to answer them for you.

  1. No doubt, PO marked your suggestion as high priority but that does not mean you will get a high score for suggesting a small enhancement.

  2. This suggested feature is a minor improvement because it does not impact the functionality or usability significantly. It is just a slight enhancement.

  3. The main purpose of the purpose of the project is to provide an alternative interface for steemit, that is posting, commenting and upvoting along with the "transfers". Anything related to the above mentioned functions is in direct relation with the project.

  4. The mock-ups aren't bad but they aren't of excellent quality as well. Mock-ups could have been better if you had used high quality images. Your mock-ups don't retail their original quality upon zooming. You could have used multiple mock-ups also.
    I would still say that your mock-ups aren't poor but I had to choose between excellent and poor.

  5. The title of the contribution should briefly explain the suggested feature which was missing.
    In the "proposal description" section you are supposed to write the description of your proposal, not the problem.

Recently, eSteem releases a new update to its eSteem Surfer app for laptops and desktop devices running on the Windows and Linux operating system.

It should be released instead of releases and if it is laptops, it should be desktops.
This is just the first sentence of your contribution, there are a few more grammatical errors in your contribution.
Please keep in mind thataverage is the second best option to choose and that is not as bad as it sounds.

I am sure, I have answered all your questions with good detail but if you still have any doubts, feel free to reply back to the comment or reach out to help channel on our discord.