I think we've finally reached the point where our conversation kind of appears to be this:
"Vaccines are safe."
"Nope."
"They work."
"Nope."
"Here's how we know it."
"Dissembler. Disinfo agent."
"Okay? But really, the evidence that vaccines aren't safe is pretty poor."
"You're okay with children being abused so pharmaceuticals can profit."
"Literally no one was hurt by SV40."
"Yes they were. There's a doctor at the CDC who wants to testify to congress about something unrelated. Vaccines are good business so they can't also work."
"You're getting a little tangential."
"Read our thirty pages of correspondence and show me one imperfection in my thinking or analysis. Obfuscator."
"Look, you're making a lot of unsubstantiated claims here. Vaccines as genocide is a bit extreme."
"The foster care system is full of abuse."
"Yes. But it's not full of polio."
"Shill. The polio vaccine isn't safe."
"What?"
"There's no therapeutic range for mercury."
"Yeah there is man, there are lots of drugs that we have to be careful with because too much of it stops being therapeutic."
"Shill, you are complicit in the murder of children. Read this website."
You just seem to be accepting a lot of things as true that you don't seem to have much direct experience with. Maybe I'm wrong about that, but that's what it looks like.
I have tried as best I know how to convince you that vaccines are safe, but none of the things I point to are acceptable to you as truthful, or accurate. There's not much I can do about that. Still, I think you make yourself look a lot less smart with all the attacks on my motivation, or my apparent complicity in a genocide, or my disregard for patient safety or public health.
I mean, look at my sarcastic little parody I just wrote about our conversation? Wouldn't you say it is the least powerful thing I've had to say? Same deal.
Since the only actual refutation you've provided is the one I goaded you into, it does seem pointless to continue this conversation.
I won't repeat those points here, nor any of the 96 links already provided for you to refute, since you won't even look at them.
Here's a study in the journal Nature, which even you will admit is not a fringe lunatic paranoid rant.
Vaccines are killing people, and we need to make them safer.
That's all I want.
Why don't you want that?