THe logic has become incredibly confused in my opinion. It's okay for bernie to flag tiny accounts because he disagrees with them, but not okay for canadian-coconut? Although she did not actually threaten him, she was just explaining what could happen, if she were the type to do that. Do you really believe flags should be used because you disagree with someone? Because I think that it would become a huge mess on here in a hurry if people did that.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The logic is plain and simple. Flag how you please. Please may disagree but on you go.
I was commenting to provide a counter opinion on @canadian-coconut 's and your implication that there's a way things are done around here. I also wanted to call her up on a threat. But just because I haven't commented on @berniesander 's posts to admonish him doesn't mean I think it's okay for him to carry on as he does.
I think flags should be used however you want. And there's no way for someone else to stop you except to try to persuade you to change your mind by opening a dialogue (which in my experience is how things mostly shake out) or by flagging them into reconsidering.
And it already is a huge mess, but then so is every social network with any amount of freedom.