The funny thing about the study is that no actual experiments were done to come to the conclusion it came to. It is a real example of an ology that is not Natural Science. If you cannot put the evidence on the table so to speak it is not natural science. They just played with numbers and used statistics to come to the conclusion they did. They could just as likely be wrong in their conclusion and it still proves my point. There is no logic or reason to trust such a system.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: