You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Vote-trading...

in #votetrading4 years ago

Not yet seen this but not surprising case, I think we're lacking a cap, a maximum voting value of one account on a post.

In our case, if the cap was at 1 HIVE of maximum voting value of an account on a post it would force it to vote about 50 posts per day instead of 10 and would encourage a better distribution and more curation or to encourage them to delegate more to curation teams such as @curie (for me is the best and most complete by its internationalization) or yours or others. The other advantage is also to solve the problem of suspicion of favoritism of some upvotes.

Of course this is also valid for the downvote, if we want a democracy then every action risking strong repercussions must be the work of the greatest number and not of one.

My proposal is certainly not perfect either, but by combining a certain number of rules suggested by everyone at some point we will find the alchemy that will finally solve all these problems, at least I hope so 🤣


Witness FR - Gen X - Geek 🤓 Gamer 🎮 traveler ⛩️

Sort:  

But would curie and other curation accounts be exempt from that same cap? This would likely just lead to creation of fake curation accounts. On the other hand if curie is also capped, they'd need to curate 5-10x more content, curators have limited time so it's impractical.

Hi @kristyglas, thanks for your feedback 👍

I don't think it's a big problem for them, already splitting their votes and having as @curie a significant team of curators (1 per country/language) and I think it's same for @acidyo with @ocd curation.

Rather, I think that the curation teams should have a specific account (ex: Cura-12345) like the community owner accounts (Hive-12345) on which a compensation system could be set up to reward their investment for the HIVE community. For my part I think that this system should be integrated directly into the core of HIVE.

This makes it possible to create a micro-economy around curation and to reward at their fair value all the actors in the curation process. For my part they have as much merit as a witness if not more (and I am a witness!). As for the compensation, I think it can perhaps come from the SPS (proposal fund system).


Witness FR - Gen X - Geek 🤓 Gamer 🎮 traveler ⛩️