But would curie and other curation accounts be exempt from that same cap? This would likely just lead to creation of fake curation accounts. On the other hand if curie is also capped, they'd need to curate 5-10x more content, curators have limited time so it's impractical.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hi @kristyglas, thanks for your feedback 👍
I don't think it's a big problem for them, already splitting their votes and having as @curie a significant team of curators (1 per country/language) and I think it's same for @acidyo with @ocd curation.
Rather, I think that the curation teams should have a specific account (ex: Cura-12345) like the community owner accounts (Hive-12345) on which a compensation system could be set up to reward their investment for the HIVE community. For my part I think that this system should be integrated directly into the core of HIVE.
This makes it possible to create a micro-economy around curation and to reward at their fair value all the actors in the curation process. For my part they have as much merit as a witness if not more (and I am a witness!). As for the compensation, I think it can perhaps come from the SPS (proposal fund system).
Witness FR - Gen X - Geek 🤓 Gamer 🎮 traveler ⛩️