You assert that the conspiracy can help all these different causes but you didn't offer one simple detail on why and how and expect your vacuous assertions to stand by themselves, is that because you have a disdain for common sense, or is it because you'd assert a large insurmountable conspiracy and speak about non-existent or outright bogus theoretical models that even a child would deduce to be utterly flawed as if they hold any credence and offered absolutely no source to validate such credence yet want to make assertions to their credence in the same way you make assertions as to the purpose of such a grand, no, giant conspiracy?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You seem to be lacking the ability to have a logical discussion without trying to make things personal.
The main things that I’ve gotten out of this exchange are that you believe the version of history you’ve heard is absolutely correct, you believe your imagination covers all possibilities, & that you can provide links to standard explanations that lack logical sense, despite your faith in them. There is nothing in these responses of value for me & I don’t believe you are open minded enough for me to spend my time continuing to read your attempted insults.
If you want to insult strangers, do it in the real world where you can expirement with real physics & have some fun 😃
I could write a long winded response, countering every single point you’ve made, but my perspective is your ego & programming gets in the way of your potential for creative thinking & positive discussion. Good luck to you on your quest for knowledge & improved communication
I absolutely fail to comprehend how throwing a ball in a slow moving car can prove anything about how a plane flying 500mph over a enormous ball spinning 1000mph behaves. That would require a leap of faith for me to believe it as they are nowhere near close to comparable in speed, size, scale or logic.