As I understand it (I'm no hydrologist mind you) hydrodynamic principles change with huge volume of water. Maybe that could account for different effects of movement?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
As I understand it (I'm no hydrologist mind you) hydrodynamic principles change with huge volume of water. Maybe that could account for different effects of movement?
Sure, but you’d be spinning 1000mph at the equator & significantly slower 1/2 way to the pole. Water behaves universally in my physical life experience. Why does the spin of the earth not affect flight times in any direction? There are many more examples of things that I can model perfectly on a big sea level plane, but need crazy theoretical terms that can’t be modeled to make work on a ball.
It is the most interesting subject I’ve ever studied, & by far the most taboo. If you start trying to have the conversation, you will see some very passionate responses backed by very little logic & giant leaps of programmed faith. Most interesting
I lived in a town in Ecuador for about ten months that had the highest concentration of weirdos of anywhere I've ever been. (I say weirdos with the greatest fondness)
There were at least 100 flat earthers there and most were quite vocal. I cannot discount anything and like you I find the subject fascinating.
The worst case scenario is everyone talks about the physics we experience everyday & science! What’s so wrong with that? Why so many pop culture references against it? Why has there never in the history of tv or movies been a flat earth themed environment? Fun questions to ask