I decided to flag mostly because I didn't think that a post that attacks people and was poorly researched and largely retracted (with the remaining unretracted portion amounting to "I don't like these posts because of my version of morality") should earn a large reward.
It wasn't only one thing either. You claimed that @craig-grant was hurt by the contest, yet he replied here stating that he likes them and thinks they should continue. Again, if you are going to launch witch hunts based on alleged harms to people, at least check your facts and get it right.
I'd suggest we move on, put this mess behind us, and all focus on making Steem/it better in our own ways.
Well, the way I read the convo in that thread (the one screencapped in the post) it very much seemed to me Craig had hurt feelings. Perhaps I was wrong but when a mans starts talking about the poor vote and the money vote and whatnot that isn't a sign of taking a loss lightly. I believe he was effected by it emotionally in a negative way, regardless of how cool he's playing it now. :/
I do agree though smooth. It's been a long damn day. New personal record for replies to one post though! Regardless of how provocative or terribly researched it was.. I don't regret posting it and getting the discussion going in the comments..
Cheers man.