You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Zclassic: The Case for Rebranding to BitcoinZ

in #zclassic8 years ago

... lol well they chose hush anyway so.

I see your argument that anything should be able to use the bitcoin name in the spirit of Satoshi. I would argue it is still quite deceptive to the industry to rename your coin in a way that is confusing with the established leader of the space: Bitcoin. Just because it is an improvement on BTC doesn't mean you just copy the name. There is a reason there is not any other bitcoin clone names being used.

Sort:  

Thanks. Understood. BTW, article mentions Bitcoin Dark, Bitcoin Plus, Bitcoin 21, First Bitcoin.

Yeah all of those are shit, deceptive junk coins.