i will not touch on foster homes, that is not my intent and not my knowledge base. What I have been saying from the beginning is that taking children away is an extremely small amount of what CPS workers do. Secondly, I fail to see how it is the fault of CPS workers taking away children when the real problem seems to be those who foster children.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
And this is exactly why it is American whites whom the UN says should pay reparations for slavery, even though it was Africans who enslaved, and sold, most slaves that ended up in America in the 18th century.
The CPS serves exactly the same role as gangs of slavers did in Africa. It provides product to the market. This doesn't absolve the market.
But it sure as hell doesn't absolve the CPS either.
I can find no evidence of the UN claiming this. Whom sold salves is important, does this mean we should disregard the atrocities committed for hundreds of years? The CPS is a government funded agency, they make no money by putting kids in foster care.
Literally, the first link on a search.
You're not even trying.
While government agencies make no profit from any corruption, it still goes on. Why? How? What could be the mechanism that drives corruption?
Could it be that the corrupt people in government agencies use the assets of the government to enrich themselves, rather than the agencies?
What do you think?
You're not even reading. This article talks about a group in the UN which hopes to have current economic issues which are typical in African American communities to be remedied. This is not the same as being paid reparations for slavery, not even close.
Of course governments are filled with corruption and there is plenty of money to be made. I cannot see who would profit from foster children other than the foster parents who get money.
You're right. I didn't read the article at all, and merely linked it to show that my contention that the UN is advocating reparations from white Americans to the descendents of slaves in America - as long as those slaves weren't white - was easily shown via a simple search.
You said you had no evidence of such claims.
I vehemently disagree that reparations are appropriate, so don't bother reading such drivel.
That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, which was your implication.
All I did was search for 'UN slave reparations America' and paste the first link.
There were many, many more, and I have seen other quotes from the UN that does, in fact, advocate such reparations.
You are welcome to read on down the list.
I have better and productive things to do.
I have read it and they do not show what you claim they do. I find it funny that you admit you didnt read it. Are you aware that the media will hype up a headline and have different content?
You are changing the subject.
You said you could find no evidence of the claim.
I didn't say the claim was contained in the link I shared. I said it was evidence that was trivial to find.
I find your arguments are perfectly following the known methods shills use.
I believe you are a shill, paid to counter popular investigation into the industry that pays you to disseminate propaganda. If you're not actually a paid shill, you're a vile, manipulative person.
I, therefore won't feed the troll any further.