Stick with me and when I have finished this series you can shoot me down as much as you wish. I don't think that you will be disappointed and I welcome you to do so if I have not tied this all back together into one very coherent and consistent story.
You do raise a good point though. I could have written a better ending to this post and I will now go back and see how I can improve on it.
Thanks for your feedback, I appreciate it.
Honestly, it was a very compelling, well-written post. I'd just steem on to the next part of the series.
Ok, ok... more honestly... I just want to read more.
thanks @prufarchy and I'm pleased that you enjoyed reading the 1st post. I am working on the next one now!
Let me be clear, I am glad you are getting the information out there. I have read other articles on the subject in the past and they substantiate the narrative you are sharing. My preference is the gather the facts and draw my own conclusions. I tend to interpret sensationalization as a tool to hype a topic when the facts don't quite substantiate the claim. In your case, I think the facts more than substantiate your claim and no sensationalization is need. The sensationalization then hurts your argument because it makes me wonder why you feel you need to sensationalize the article. But this is just my personal preference. I encourage you to finish your series and I will consider your argument as a whole rather than the parts.