Hard disagree on this, just feels like a group of insiders voting to allocate themselves some time on the printing press before the other landholders who aren't actively involved don't notice and miss out.
I don't even own land, this doesn't impact me in the slightest, but we need to say no to all "quickly decide to allocate stuff from a general pool to the people who happened to do this one thing that wasn't previously laid out that it needed to be done."
This is pure insider nonsense. But of course it will sadly pass because those landholders who haven't been active and surveying won't be around to vote no.
Out of principle we should be against things like this that alter the terms after the fact. Imagine if you bought high dividend stock in a company and didn't attend their annual meeting and they decided at the annual meeting that anyone who wasn't present at the meeting would not be eligible to collect dividends. This is no different. Pure shady and dishonest insider shenanigans.
do you realize that the sps airdrop does not actually exist. it was only introduced because of a proposal and the waiting time.
I think YOU are missing the point. Nobody 'bought in' with the expectation of SPS rewards prior to land being implemented by simply holding tokens. It was never offered as an entitlement to owning tokens. The rewards were voted on as a stop gap measure until land was live. Land will now advance to 1.5 and that proposal needs to be revisited. Rewards will get cut off eventually for those who don't participate either way. Will you complain then if it doesn't happen now?
Ironically the sense of entitlement the dao vote would create was a matter of discussion...
If you're arguing from first principles then it would never be appropriate to cut off rewards for people that don't participate. Participation is the entire premise of land, not token dividends. Taking away these rewards was always bound to be an issue for some. I have about 150 plots and have doubts I will be able to survey it all in time, yet I understand the spirit of the initial DAO vote as does @Jarvie who stands to lose more than I if this passes. There will never be a convenient time to take rewards away from people, but that is inevitable.
I think not only you have difficulty understanding this proposal but also having difficulty understanding how land is supposed to work. Please invest more time reading the whitepaper which is long and complicated.
On a different note, this proposal will likely pass easily.
A couple of big hitters just voted against. Likely because of greed... so it's now very much on the fence.
I can fix it real quick if that’s what you like @jarvie
you don't seem to understand well. i don't feel like explaining it to you. but your argument i would like to refute, even the one who wrote the proposal still has a whole region that is unclaimed....
There are not even 10 people who vote "no". these are almost all multi accounts of the same people you see there. do you notice anything else? 🤣
He may be an alt for one of those whale accounts... ever think of that? hahahaha
yes, there is no other way to explain why someone who likes to discuss and advocate for the rights of the poor whales does not have an account onn discord ;)
so you feel that people who are not active with their land should continue getting paid when the only reason that they were getting paidf in the first place was because of land delays? Land delays are no longer. land is moving forward. Either participate or miss out.