Why don't you go to BLURT? It could be a heaven for you. No DV's there !
If somehow majority will decide to eliminate downvotes on POB - it will be so.
This will be also a 100% reason for me to leave POB tribe immediately. ( as a supporter and investor)
Not only I would dump all my tokens on the market, but perhaps POB soon will get new, the biggest abuser on this tribe.
Why not? What will you do for him? No downvotes there! How you punish him?
Mute? ha ha ha
Muting takes away rewards, but not stops person posting, commenting on the tribe.
After all, you will have to mute hundreds of new accounts every day - new FREE account tickets can be produced every day.
Think twice before you do this your "third amendment".
Thank you for your comment and clear stance on this issue. I appreciate your view on this issue and I really did want to hear from you specifically.
I proposed a question of a POB community without a downvote. And you explained your stance for me and others here to understand.
Thank you for sharing your voice. I believe your voice here is just as powerful as your stake.
I think we basically have the same question:
I agree that we all need to think twice about the third ammendment. I wrote it as a question because I really don't know the best way to police and protect the community.
If downvote is the only way then do you think there should be guidlines of what situation a user should express their right to downvote on Proof of Brain?
I saw yesterday and extremely good explanation of DV "problem" to someone. I'm myself not so good in putting things together so well and logical, as AZ did. But... I sign below EVERY SINGLE WORD in his recent comment:
Thanks again for keeping me informed. I'm beginning to see both sides here. The reward pool can be abused through upvoting just as much or more than it would be through downvoting.
I see a yin and yang play here. As one goes one way the other corrects.
My number 3 ammendment doesn't look feasible in this community.
I read some of the posts about voting from a couple days ago and it got my head spinning.
I don't like when only a few people are getting most of the rewards and I also don't think the best way to communicate to them is through a downvote. They are community members who contribute and make opportunities for others to engage.
It would be best to come to an agreement with them how to use the reward pool. They seem to have the same objective in the end to grow and share rewards equally.
Peace
Thought the only reason for a user to downvote any content was if the content is plagiarized! Is there more to downvoting than this(plagiarism)?
This is the exact topic od discussion in community. Should downvotes be given for abuse of the reward pool? Should downvotes be given for spam? Who should give the downvotes and should we be responsible before the community for any downvote given?
Spam ain't good so in my opinion I think if a content contains spam then the downvote is worth it.
Everyone has his or her powers to either upvote or downvote a post. When it comes to downvoting a post, I think a particular reason should be given by the user who downvoted the post in the comment section so everyone could know the reason that triggered the post to be downvoted.