@trostparadox's proposal recommendation is available for review and scrutiny. It's got some interesting proposals that significantly change the way DV's get handled.
The fraud you mentioned gets DV'd. No question about that, however, you have to list the reasoning for the DV. DV's I apply, for instance regarding plagiarism, get's a link to the original source at a minimum.
All other DV's are pretty much by consensus. Leaders have to agree to DV before applying it. I don't know if another tribe has done it this way. I welcome your review and opinion on his recommendation.