those
who create disharmony in the community
crappy quality doesn't get voted for anyhow, but those people that cant handle different viewpoints and downvote?
a cancer
DV needs to be restricted solely to spam, plagiarism, and illegal activity.
"bullying" is handled in the tech with mute.
"hate speech", especially "hate speech" supported by empirical evidence is an argument.
if the "hate speech" is wrong, adults will make the counter argument.
"hate speech" that hurts the feelfeelz of midwits can be taken off the midwit's feed by mute.
only a subhuman WHO is unable to do those two simple actions resort to the DV.
@trostparadox's proposal recommendation is available for review and scrutiny. It's got some interesting proposals that significantly change the way DV's get handled.
The fraud you mentioned gets DV'd. No question about that, however, you have to list the reasoning for the DV. DV's I apply, for instance regarding plagiarism, get's a link to the original source at a minimum.
All other DV's are pretty much by consensus. Leaders have to agree to DV before applying it. I don't know if another tribe has done it this way. I welcome your review and opinion on his recommendation.
A very valid constructive criticism... But that does not apply to the contest, @stevescoins. If you want to participate, just say a trait (one word) that you find troubling or that you don't like to see in writers who cause problems in the community.
ah so
disharmonious
thanks!
Thank you for participating in the contest, @stevescoins.
!pizza