The third edition of Spreading POB has come to an end, and before we start the next one, let's know who the winners were.
WINNERS:
First Place: 15 POBs
@gr33nm4ster (03 votes).Second Place: 10 POBs
@da-prince (02 votes).Third Place (tie): 05 POBs (1.25 POBs each)
@rentmoney (01 vote), @bobthebuilder2 (01 vote), @darmst5339 (01 vote) and @dibblers.dabs (01 vote)
Now, let's go to the FOURTH EDITION..
If you could kick a user out of the POB community based on a profile trait that you hate in writers who don't write well or who create disharmony in the community, what trait would that be?
For now... That's it folks. Now it's up to you.
La tercera edición de Spreading POB ha llegado a su fin, y antes de comenzar la siguiente, sepamos quiénes fueron los ganadores.
GANADORES:
Primer Lugar: 15 POBs
@gr33nm4ster (03 votos).Segundo Lugar: 10 POBs
@da-prince (02 votos).Tercer Lugar (empate): 05 POBs (1.25 POBs para cada uno)
@rentmoney (01 voto), @bobthebuilder2 (01 voto), @darmst5339 (01 voto) y @dibblers.dabs (01 voto)
Ahora, vayamos a la CUARTA EDICIÓN...
Si pudieras expulsar a un usuario de la comunidad POB en función de un rasgo de perfil que odias en los escritores que no escriben bien o que crean discordia en la comunidad, ¿qué rasgo sería?
Por ahora... Eso es todo, chicos e chicas. Ahora depende de usted.
A terceira edição chegou do Spreading POB ao fim, e antes de nós começarmos a próxima, vamos saber quais foram os vencedores.
VENCEDORES:
Primeiro Lugar: 15 POBs
@gr33nm4ster (03 votos).Segundo Lugar: 10 POBs
@da-prince (02 votos).Terceiro Lugar (empate): 05 POBs (1.25 POBs para cada um)
@rentmoney (01 voto), @bobthebuilder2 (01 voto), @darmst5339 (01 voto) and @dibblers.dabs (01 voto)
Agora, vamos para a QUARTA EDIÇÃO...
Se você pudesse expulsar um usuário da comunidade POB com base em um traço do perfil que você odeia nos escritores que não escrevem bem ou que criam desarmonia na comunidade, que traço seria esse?
Por enquanto, é isso pessoal... Agora depende de vocês!
I would never kick a user out of the community for writers who don't write well or who create disharmony in the community. This platform should be decentralized and everyone should be free to voice their thoughts in what ever way suits them. If that is poor writing (which some times mine falls into) or create disharmony by stating their opinions, that is their right.
The technology available allows for the readers to not read the posting and to remove that person from their feeds. I do not agree with or believe in censorship so would never kick someone for either of those two reasons.
BTW - thanks for the tokens. Tied for third, not bad. LOL
I agree with you, @darmst5339... However, the situation proposed in this contest is hypothetical. So, if you want to participate, just say a trait (one word) that you find troubling or that you don't like to see in writers who cause problems in the community.
those
crappy quality doesn't get voted for anyhow, but those people that cant handle different viewpoints and downvote?
a cancer
DV needs to be restricted solely to spam, plagiarism, and illegal activity.
"bullying" is handled in the tech with mute.
"hate speech", especially "hate speech" supported by empirical evidence is an argument.
if the "hate speech" is wrong, adults will make the counter argument.
"hate speech" that hurts the feelfeelz of midwits can be taken off the midwit's feed by mute.
only a subhuman WHO is unable to do those two simple actions resort to the DV.
@trostparadox's proposal recommendation is available for review and scrutiny. It's got some interesting proposals that significantly change the way DV's get handled.
The fraud you mentioned gets DV'd. No question about that, however, you have to list the reasoning for the DV. DV's I apply, for instance regarding plagiarism, get's a link to the original source at a minimum.
All other DV's are pretty much by consensus. Leaders have to agree to DV before applying it. I don't know if another tribe has done it this way. I welcome your review and opinion on his recommendation.
A very valid constructive criticism... But that does not apply to the contest, @stevescoins. If you want to participate, just say a trait (one word) that you find troubling or that you don't like to see in writers who cause problems in the community.
ah so
disharmonious
thanks!
Thank you for participating in the contest, @stevescoins.
!pizza
I find disingenuity an issue. We see a fair few people who are disingenuous on this platform, insincere in their comments on posts, especially on posts of authors with high voting power. Claiming to be a big fan, begging for upvotes or delegations after trying unsuccessfully to butter up the very suspecting victim with false compliments. Not saying the authors are not deserving of credit or praise, just that false adoration of those authors, in an attempt to ply some POB turns me off. If you want to be part of a community, BE part of that community. Put in the effort and at the very least engage meaningfully with your peers. You may just learn something along the way and grow from the experience.
Thank you for participating in the contest, @samsmith1971.
This post is shared to Twitter in support of @ocd and @ocdb's #posh initiative.
Congratulations @wiseagent! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
@wiseagent ,I really don't get this right I guess ,just want to ask that this contest is it all about kicking users out of the POB community due to bad post or any form of plagiarism
Hi, @pthker2010.
The contest won't kick anyone out of the community, it's just a hypothetical situation. All you have to do is write one word that represents a negative trait in the way writers who don't write well or who cause problems in the community.
Simple as that.
Thanks for the tokens and congrats to the other winners.
My choice for this weeks word is.....
!BEER
Thank you for participating in the contest, @rentmoney.
Thanks for hosting it.
!BEER
Sorry, out of BEER, please retry later...
View or trade
BEER.BEERHey @wiseagent, here is a little bit of from @rentmoney for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.very popular this POB is...seeing lots of posts in it. I have not managed to take off here yet.
All you have to do is write one word that represents a negative trait in the way writers who don't write well or who cause problems in the community, @mintymile.
It's quite simple.
That person who is: boring
Thank you for participating in the contest, @hranhuk.
Wow I'm so happy to come second in the contest, twas actually my first time participating in the contest and I won second position.
Thank you.
So... What are you waiting for to parcipate again, @da-prince? Haha!
I want to but I'm finding it hard to understand the concept of the Contest, do mind enlighten me more on it?
Sorry I went through it again and I understood the concept, I've drop my word for the contest.
wish me luck and thank you for keeping the pob community lively and active with this contest.
my word is --- ADAMANT
When they fail to change or adhere to corrections.
Thank you.
I would never kick a user out of the community for poor or offensive writing. I think everyone is allowed to write as they wish and we should have the brains to ignore poor writing as curators.
It's not grammar and spelling that turns me off. I like new ways of spelling words and experimenting with English. I used words in the last WOTW contest that don't exist in the dictionary like chunkage and clumpage. These words don't really exist in the English language but are words that I use colloquially. So I couldn't kick someone out for spelling problems. Grammar is also an issue but many times I prefer to use my own grammar like, "Who you be?"
But what makes it most difficult for me to read a post in the community is when the author doesn't know what they are talking about. After reading a few lines it is so esoteric or so twisted that the post really has no point at all. Sometimes that could be fun like a post of MEMEs or a circular argument but when I finish reading the post and I look at words and paragraphs I just read and I still don't know the writer's point of view then I'm puzzled. It makes me think those paragraphs were copied and summarized or maybe translated through AI. In that case it is really important to provide the original language.
When it comes down to it I'm not kicking anyone out, even for circular arguments like the one I am making now. But try to make some point in your post or one day somebody may kick you out.^^
f you could kick a user out of the POB community based on a profile trait that you hate in writers who don't write well or who create disharmony in the community, what trait would that be?
For now... That's it folks. Now it's up to you.