Source: Screenshot of some of the top stories related to Carbon Tax in Canada today.
So, if you're not a Canadian citizen, this may not be news that you're aware of, but it's super topical here right now for a number of reasons. For those of you not following Canadian news an politics, I'll give a brief summary to catch you up.
The Liberals and Justin Trudeau introduced the tax in 2018, anticipating that it would remove an average of 50 million tonnes of CO2 per year. They recently increased that tax price as of April 1st, while at the same time increasing salaries to every member of parliament. Talk about a fun April Fools! The joke's on all of us, as we deal with massive inflation, wage growth that doesn't keep up with cost of living, and taxes that "are for the environment" and "provide rebates you'll probably make more off of"!
Carbon pricing in Canada is forecast by Environment Canada to remove 50-60 MT of emissions from the air annually by 2022, which represents about 12% of all Canadian emissions. However, Canada needs to reduce emissions to 512 MT by 2030 to meet its Paris Climate Change Accord. This would mean reducing annual emissions by about 200MT from the 2018 levels. In addition to carbon pricing, the government is pursuing a range of additional policies including improving fuel standards, energy efficiency, and closing coal plants.[50]
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_pricing_in_Canada
So, how has that gone? About as well as you'd expect from a tax that effectively punishes the working class:
In 2020, we did manage a net negative in emissions of about 50 million tonnes... but then increased in 2021 and 2022. We have no data on 2023, but the data we do have doesn't suggest that we'll that -50MT y-o-y that they forecasted.
And, let's be real - of course, we won't see that, because the Carbon Tax is purely punitive. On paper, it's supposed to push the average Canadian into investing in more efficient technologies and using our vehicles less.
They said then, in 2018:
"Consumers and households will save money over the long term by improving energy efficiency (such as better insulation) and using cleaner technologies such as smart thermostats. As new technologies become available, their cost will likely fall, and they will likely become more widely available and effective over time."
But over 1/3rd of Canadians are renters, and when was the last time you stepped into a rental that was equipped with a Smart Furnace? Of those 2/3rds that own their homes, how many are investing in things like home solar systems, energy-efficient appliances, and all the rest? Who can possibly afford to?
We've already seen that the estimations they gave us in 2018 when they instituted this were wildly inaccurate. We hit -50MT once, and it hasn't happened again since. But the government gets to pull in a few billion dollars per year, set it in an account to gain interest, and then dole that back out to us in the form of rebates.
Yay.
Most Canadian cities suck for public transit, making that a non-viable option for the vast majority of the working class. Hybrid or full-EV vehicles may help, provided you live in a city with charging stations available, and the money to buy one. A lot of folks simply don't have that luxury, in the same way as they don't have the luxury of being able to install solar. So, every single time we turn on a vehicle to get to work, we're being hit with carbon tax in the form of gas use - which we have to use because if we don't work we don't get paid. There's a fun cycle for you.
But on top of that, everything that is trucked anywhere in the whole damned country also is hit with carbon pricing, and it's not like we can just stop having trucks deliver goods to fucking Walmart or any of the other businesses out there. So those prices go up to compensate, and the average person in effect gets hit with a secondary tax on everything we buy.
And, in the end, what does all that taxed money do? It generates revenue for the government. Which they use for... what? Who knows! They can use that for whatever they want, because the interest gained is free money for them. They pass the buck by saying 'well, your local governments could be using this to put towards green initiatives but instead they provide you rebates'. So the Feds get to wash their hands of doing nothing, while the Provinces do the best they can to not have folks riot.
All the while, Canada produces 1.89% of the CO2 emissions we're hoping to curb.
(Source: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-by-country/)
Now, 1.89% does still leave us in 7th place globally, so it's not insignificant but no amount of reduction in Canada is going to offset the emissions China makes, and the money we're taxed isn't even being effectively used, which for me, personally, is the biggest kick in the teeth.
I don't even really care if we do pay a bit more at the pump, but what's the fucking point if, at the end of the day, those proceeds aren't being effectively used to invest in green initiatives?
We could be taking the percent of revenue the government collects and investing in solar, wind, and nuclear. Instead, we still have 9 coal-burning power plants active in the country, with hopes to shut them down by 2030. Instead, we have a black box on the spending, with the only details being that it'll be "directed to programs to help businesses, schools, municipalities and other grant recipients reduce their fossil fuel consumption."
Note that this says: grant recipients. So, for folks that request funds, and are approved, those will come from this pool of money. Which is all well and good except it's entirely reactive and not proactive. It shifts the focus once again from the government not doing anything useful to "oh, well, folks just haven't done what we needed them to, to get this funding" - a song and dance that the government (either party), just loves to play.
All while the PM sits on a 400k/year salary, while all the MP's sit on 200k/year, and pat themselves on the back as they fly around the country on the taxpayer's dime.
But hey, don't worry, the carbon is being taxed. 🙄
And that blip in 2020 probably had everything to do with policies implemented because of COVID and nothing to do with the carbon tax proving that all you have to do to reduce carbon output is to destroy the economy.
Locking 90% of a population inside their homes for a year does have a funny side effect of reducing traffic, who could have predicted that eh. 😂
I have heard the authoritarian environmentalists try to argue we need regular lockdowns for the sake of the environment.
Wouldn't surprise me. But they don't look past the short term effects to what the long term effects might be.
I'm always suspicious of a "crisis" where the solution is to tax the middle and lower classes, imposing measures that restrict their liberties and add to government control, while simultaneously transferring huge sums of money upwards to those who are already super-rich. Why are all the conferences held in swanky destinations which involve flying on private jets - why not just do a Zoom conference ?
The human race has issues of over-population and over-usage of resources, but none of the solutions I've seen taxes levied for seem to address those.
Right? Like, there are real issues at play, and stuff like cutting down our use of throw-away plastics, getting into greener energy, etc etc... that's all good stuff. But taxing the majority isn't going to get us to our goals. My entire life of CO2 is overshadowed by just one lifetime politician's private flights.
Instead of taxes, give me some cash incentives to do green stuff. I have a house with a roof that I'd love to put solar on! But it costs me 20k+ to get it installed and the best I can get is a $5000 rebate. Feels a little lopsided to me.
In the long run, I do still want solar on this place and I'm going to have to just suck up the cost when we get to that point, but my more immediate need is a second vehicle as we have our third kid on the way. So... 20-40k on a 'nice to have' energy upgrade isn't exactly in the cards for the next year or two, at BEST.
What? A government program failed to do what it claimed, and the only observable result is higher costs from the people? I am shocked, shocked, I say!
It happens so rarely right. I totally understand the shock. 🤣😂🤣
Is there really anywhere on planet earth that the government make policies to favour the poor and middle class? One would think it will be better in developed societies, I am quite surprised it is similar with what goes on in my country.
Governments are all corrupt, run by the rich so that the rich can stay in power. It's a crapshoot everywhere.
It's a sad tale
Congratulations @oblivioncubed! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 65000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts: