Big accounts can do sponsorship deals.
But there are a ton of smaller accounts not whoring themselves out and monetising their web2 socials.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Big accounts can do sponsorship deals.
But there are a ton of smaller accounts not whoring themselves out and monetising their web2 socials.
I follow quite a few small accounts and they get paid to advertise,by selling their own merch, donations and other ways,like through Patreon .They set up their own amazon stores and make a percentage selling other ppls products that way
There we go 👍
Selling branded merch and affiliate revenue.
Literally not a single person is doing that here!
Thats because the personalities here aren't offering anything people want.They want info,examples for how to live,hear what they are thinking themselves, but can't put it into words,etc.Most here just want easy-write lame shit and get paid
That's because the way to earn the most money on Hive is to be here a long time and get on autovoters.
Which only works on long form.
Those with stake are literally incentivising the behaviour that is detrimental to their investment
1-I know, that's why I never bothered here much. I signed up 7 years, but only put in real effort twice for 3 months each. It was too much like a job, while earning pennies, because I won't suck dick for votes.
2-It isn't about content, it's about relationship building
1/3: Exactly this.
And the content itself completely doesn't matter at all.
What you write is not linked to your earnings in any way.
2/3: The HIVE blockchain incentivises repetitive spam to spread its governance token.
But its up to layer-2's like LEO to use their token to monetise the content.
3/3: Here on Threads, we run ads that generate revenue.
To maximise ad views, we don't want repetitive spam, we want quality so people come back.
So let's start incentivising that type of behaviour!!
If that's true, then why don't they curate content posted to other communities through their frontend? The only curation I see still only wants financial content.
True
I try to do that with each vote I cast - favoring my votes toward people who have back and forth engagement like in your threads here
It can’t just be me tho. Leading from the front but ppl need to follow
Combine with evergreen
Some sell a lot of crappy courses
So everyone on leofinance is here to 'make money from writing online'.
Do you think someone could create a course and sell it for 10 HIVE?
1000 people at 10 HIVE is 10K HIVE for 1 piece of content.
Totally. Very few people see the true social aspect of Hive and its potential for monetization. It's all about chasing those fat votes
It all comes back to leo.voter incentivising the type of behaviour that is best for the platform/investors.
If the feed looks spammy (which it does), then I'd argue they need to change how they vote.
That too. But there are so many vote selling programs these days that I'm not sure leo.voter alone can help drive change
They have a LOT of stake.
Those votes have a lot of sway.
Yea it's a start I guess but I feel like the issue has deeper roots