Maybe I can even throw in the same for one dbuzz top creator every month.@christice as (non-elected) mediator between the 2 parts. I propose that if you apply the max_payout suggestion above, I will support the @dbuzz account adding it to my database so that @marcocasario will give it a $ 0.20 upvote every day.
No one here is against freedom of speech, the only issue is monetization of low quality or illegitimate content 👍
@chrisrice Addition: if you also automatically refuse payout in the dbuzz app for posts containing only one picture and max 100 characters I’ll increase the amount of dbuzz top accounts supported by @marcocasario to 4 every month. (All accounts voted by @marcocasario get also reblogged)
At least your trending page won't look like this:
Is that really worth a dollar? Debatable.
Or like this....
Everything under the sun is debatable.
Posted via D.Buzz@dbuzz has 350,000 HP so we don't necessarily need support in that respect it's kind, but the issue is the mismanagement ofHHW
Understood. Maybe just don’t get them used to get $ 1 for 10 words though..
Not necessarily. More users = more delegations and upvotes.
How many $1.00 posts do you see with $1.00 rewards vs. posts voted at that amount that recieve more?
Posted via D.BuzzPlease vote with THEIR stake based on what THEY value . . #FreeMarket
What's happens to #dBUZZ when this "twitter-like" thing Project Blank is launched?
Depends on how good their launch is.
Hopefully project blank launches soon 👍
Posted via D.Buzz
Ok so if 10,000 users posting 1 word per post or plain plagiarists realize that they can invest $50 each and make a few bucks a week upvoting each other using your app, then they’ll decide? #freemarket
We will release Decentralized Blacklists / Mutelists today, so the community could hide their posts, on an individual basis by choosing to hide those posts
I imagine those 10,000 people would fare better delegating their stake for APR or using D.Buzz naturally
Posted via D.Buzz
Hiding their posts won’t stop them from milking the system
Well if more users = more delegations and upvotes than the type.of Dapps that you use.
Do you believe in the free market or force and coersion?
Posted via D.Buzz
Sure, we can get all the bad actors of the internet in one place. More users (others would leave), is that really what we want hive to become?
Why not use it for an illegal marketplace on the deep web too? So many users, so much adoption (from criminals)...
Lol get all the "bad actors" lol.
As a matter of fact, most Governments who enforce the law have shown themselves to be illegitamate criminal orgs post 2020
Posted via D.BuzzAnd #HiveWatchers' policies are similar
Up to you though, I can’t control the likes and dislikes of your project. People with big stakes and the community will decide. Don’t be surprised though if after many months of work your project will collapse just because you didn’t make a couple of improvements that the community suggested.It was just an example in reply to your #freemarket theory. I’m not saying that dbuzz right now is full of bad actors. But I still think some improvements should be made to avoid attracting that type of users or facilitating that behavior.
Btw, I don't see bad actors on D.Buzz.
You keep straw manning me a D.Buzz with scenarios entirely different from us.
Posted via D.Buzz
Posted via D.BuzzBtw, have you used our https://d.buzz frontend yet?
Yes I tried it (pretty obvious since I sent you a d.buzz link above)
Ah okay, what do you think about it?
Posted via D.Buzz