I was actually not quite happy with my statement regarding male/female dynamics. It is too simplistic to say "males are more emotional"/"females are more logical" - which seem to imply that females have "less emotions" and males have less abilities to be logical. Which couldn't be farther from the truth!
Your answer gave me the perfect response to this obviously flawed picture!
the real fire & motivation in me is emotional in nature.
I believe that emotions/logic are the primary mode of operation, or the primary tool with which males & females approach issues or problems or anything in the world they perceive.
Which does not mean they cannot use the other tool.
This is very interesting and helpful to me, it makes me understand a lot of the dynamics at my workplace (where I'm currently the only lady among about a dozen men). A lot of my frustration is based on the fact that I expect them to be logical and analytical, but it's becoming more and more apparent to me that many misunderstandings or frictions are exactly because this expectation of mine is a) wrong and b) not useful, because to expect something and not receive it may cause some disappointment.
we were asked multiple times of day was simply "how do you feel?"
And that looks like the best way to be able to use the tool "emotions" appropriately! I realize that this is something I do often, and funnily enough, I think the reason why I do this is because of my analytical mind (which just wants to analyze and explain things to me constantly), and as it happens, emotions are something one experiences from day one - impossible to escape them. Therefore everyone is kind of forced to deal with them. Ignoring them is the worst possible choice - they will pop up sooner or later.
I wonder if it is possible to do this in reverse - using the tool "emotions" to understand and handle my tool "logic" better. Though I have not idea how.
Do you dowse?
I don't, not yet, anyway. I'm thinking - dowsing is nothing but a tool of amplifying one's intuition. Using cards, stones, a pendulum, a dowsing rod, one's hands - they are fundamentally the same.
I bet if you had asked mentally to find your phone, and let your intuition guide you, a thought would have popped in your mind to look under that book, or you would just "accidentally" have lifted that book, and found your phone!!
I checked out Pranatonix, and it does look odd that the substance container is connected that way. Eeman does indeed put it in line. However, I also found this picture in his book, where the vial is placed differently:
But - there are the additional connections "Cosmic Rays Aerial" and "Earth Rays Aerial".
Technically, there is a connection through the Earth, between the two aerials (which the picture does not show).
I'm not sure. Also, I don't really like the gel pads, and the other material used. I did a session this morning of laying in the circuit. This time with a version I made with copper wire meshes (very thin wire meshes that are used against slugs). I cobbled it together, and connected parts of it with painter's tape, because it seemed easy. (I'm a bit sick right now, so my energy levels and patience are too low to make a "good" circuit.) And while I was laying there, the thought popped into my mind that the materials are important too. They should be of the highest quality, and as clean as possible. Materials that are not toxic to the body, such as aluminum and mercury.
Patten in her book "Biocircuits" does mention it: She says to use silver solder/Jewelry solder. Normal solder contains heavy metals toxic to the human body. And my painter's tape certainly does contain substances that are not exactly beneficial to the human body, so that version is scrapped.
As you can see the E/W spirals effectively run both ways.
Hm-mm, your spirals are actually all the same: if you start at the center, and follow the line outwards (this is important), the all follow a counterclockwise direction.
Handedness of spirals is indeed tricky, depending on what we are talking about. It all boils down to the questions: Is my spiral two- or three-dimensional? And do I operate in two- or three-dimensional space?
Let me explain:
Flat spirals are technically two-dimensional objects, and by flipping them over (which is equivalent to moving them in a 3-dimensional space), the direction (left vs. right handedness) can be inverted. However, you cannot invert a flat spiral in 2d-space. If you make two flat spirals with opposite handedness, like this:
no matter how you turn them in 2d-space, they remain clock-/counterclockwise. Worded differently: Two-dimensional objects that have different mirror images are chiral. (Having different mirror images means that they cannot be superimposed to each other and match.)
A helix is a three-dimensional object, existing in a 3-dimensional space (because it cannot, for obvious reasons, exist in a 2-d space). It is also a chiral object, meaning, again, the mirror images cannot be superimposed.
For your garden to have spirals that have both handedness/are both clock- and counterclockwise, you would have to do something like this (I didn't draw the connections, but you get the idea):
As you can see, two spirals are left-handed, and two are right-handed.
Unconventional intros are the best!
Thank goodness! I did not really expect that I had to write a "conventional" intro, but your confirmation is still a relief. The examples on the peak page are ghastly indeed! Not the people, of course. I'm sure they are lovely. But each presentation is just - 08/15, as we say in German. (Meaning: cookie-cutter style.)
You could just be honest and tell the story of how you came to be here?
Absolutely! That's exactly what I had in mind.
(N.B: And my reply to you has gotten so long, I guess it's time for me to be posting for real. :-))