Our verification will likely be the equivalent of a blue checkmark, but it would be done via software, on an opt-in basis, not harrassment.
- Those who don't verify via the software, would lack a checkmark and gain less trust.
Posted via D.Buzz
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
So if someone claims to be a celebrity and doesn't want to verify that's okay? Should they get any rewards? Asking for my friend Bill Gates.
It should be the same way it's handled on Web2 sites like Google Search, a DCMA complaint between the owner of the content, and the person who posted it.
The biggest issue is the authoritarian nature of HW's and them requiring users to login to Discord, post an apology, etc.
Posted via D.Buzz
As for the rewards, that's what the #FreeMarket of upvotes and downvotes is for.
And if we creatr a verification system, + open sources it, people who verified would likely earn more, but it would be opt-in, w/out harrasment or authortarian rhetoric.
Posted via D.Buzz
Btw, what do you think about the plans of Bill Gates to "vaccinate" the world, including children, w/mRNA?
Posted via D.Buzz
I think he wants to do good, but some people think nobody would do that without some sinister ulterior motive.
Anyway I have better stuff to do than debate with you. Go create a verification system and I'll see what I think of it.
Yeah, I've got other things to make before the verification system, but @dbuzz will get to it.
All will eventually be open sourced 👍
Posted via D.Buzz