excellent time to bring up that vouching IS my best method... personally.
I'll vouch the parrent comment by @adamada (67) 6 hours ago
The vouching system is the most simplified form of decentralized verification. Seeing a lot of loopholes can be used against this system it really baffles me how dumb fucks would freely give their info on centralized social media platform to conform vs decentralized platforms where steps to verify can be done in minutes without a drama. Really lacking the proof of brain here.
@chrisrice and I broke ground on a method ... Everyone's OWN version of the BLUE CHECK can be brought to HIVE expediantly.
Here is a user who could possibly get a D.BUZZ check mark for doing certain verification Steps ... that follow THEIR free speech guildlines.
I just need to know if the owner of the account cross platform also uses the content posted on hive by acknowledging they know hive. Other sensitive info is unncessesary. Do you post on hive with x username? No? Have a good day. I think you confuse my own venture with HW that has a separate protocol of idk what, I'm just checking out for myself representing myself.
Then, 3rd party users could verify for themselves, if a user was legit, based on clicking on the blue check mark (or something similar) that would direct to the Web2 account used for verification.
Im infinitely MORE interested in Verification EARNED on D.BUZZ than i am in defending myself to Hivewatchers. For I need to be able to put THEM on a Watchlist. 🙏😎🥓👍
Technically speaking of course.
Yeah and the above case I did for myself. Do you think I was being authoritarian when I decided to check if the account was legit when it was part of the curating routine? HW has nothing to do with it.
I would ask for your other social media account and go message you there just as I would usually do on my own. But if this is the only place you post then I would just leave it at that.
The secret is that there doesn't have to be just one! Do you get it yet? Anyone can step up and do this, but it takes effort and exposes them to the sort of abuse you throw around. The evidence of identity can be made public for others to check for themselves. Can even be put on the blockchain.
Ever consider that people give a shit about Hive and not just their own profits? Some of us don't self-vote even when we get flagged.
I downvote abuse all the time so legit people can get more rewards. Sometimes they retaliate, but whatever.
If nobody does anything 'authoritarian' then Hive will be as shit as Steem has become.
Like so many "anti-" movements, the real goal isn't the stated one
They are only interested in not having their bag diluted/capital presentation, it has nothing to do with spam prevention or community quality, these are the virtuous goals given to the young enforcers who don't get realize the game
yep, just a few plutocrats that enjoy using their stake to feel "in charge" of something for once in their life...
I am clearly not a fake account, I don't plagiarize or steal content, I don't harass users (I try my best to be kind to others here)... yet here I am, one of their primary targets as of late lol
Posted via D.BuzzThis!!! ☝️😅 @frankbacon @steevc
excellent time to bring up that vouching IS my best method... personally.
I'll vouch the parrent comment by @adamada (67) 6 hours ago
@chrisrice and I broke ground on a method ... Everyone's OWN version of the BLUE CHECK can be brought to HIVE expediantly.
Here is a user who could possibly get a D.BUZZ check mark for doing certain verification Steps ... that follow THEIR free speech guildlines.
All else follows from here.
I just need to know if the owner of the account cross platform also uses the content posted on hive by acknowledging they know hive. Other sensitive info is unncessesary. Do you post on hive with x username? No? Have a good day. I think you confuse my own venture with HW that has a separate protocol of idk what, I'm just checking out for myself representing myself.
My idea is to automate blue checkmarks without acting as a middle man.
The verification I envision, will allow users to verify their @dbuzz / #HIVE account via Web2.
Posted via D.Buzz@adamada
Then, 3rd party users could verify for themselves, if a user was legit, based on clicking on the blue check mark (or something similar) that would direct to the Web2 account used for verification.
Posted via D.BuzzIf @billgates verified w/a Web2 account of 5 followers, it's fake @steevc
Im infinitely MORE interested in Verification EARNED on D.BUZZ than i am in defending myself to Hivewatchers. For I need to be able to put THEM on a Watchlist. 🙏😎🥓👍
Technically speaking of course.
N F T
A big difference between @dbuzz and #HW, is that @nathansenn and I don't desire freedom or power over others.
Decentralization > Centralization
Posted via D.Buzz
Yeah and the above case I did for myself. Do you think I was being authoritarian when I decided to check if the account was legit when it was part of the curating routine? HW has nothing to do with it.
I tried to backread a see your conversation, but from what I see, it looks like your comments are fine.
Communication on-chain for verification is more transparent than off-chain via Discord.
Better tools would make the process easier, and could be opt-in.
Posted via D.Buzz
Vouching cannot scale imo, it needs to be a seamless, automated process, without a human middle man imo.
Posted via D.Buzz
Can you verify thats me in the picture?
Can a robot?
Can I?
I would ask for your other social media account and go message you there just as I would usually do on my own. But if this is the only place you post then I would just leave it at that.
Well, if you had access to a @frankbacon Twitter account, one that had 1 million followers.
That's what's important, and our future solution will solve that.
Posted via D.Buzz
✊solidarity bruv
The secret is that there doesn't have to be just one! Do you get it yet? Anyone can step up and do this, but it takes effort and exposes them to the sort of abuse you throw around. The evidence of identity can be made public for others to check for themselves. Can even be put on the blockchain.
Ever consider that people give a shit about Hive and not just their own profits? Some of us don't self-vote even when we get flagged.
I downvote abuse all the time so legit people can get more rewards. Sometimes they retaliate, but whatever.
If nobody does anything 'authoritarian' then Hive will be as shit as Steem has become.
This is not a very good statement from a #FreeSpeech / #Censorship resistant platform user
Posted via D.BuzzAnd lacks creativity, imagination, and goodwill . . @dbuzz will create solutions, give us time
Yea definitely not something I’m here for
And btw, @snacky manages much bigger communities than #HIVE, and does a better job with his team w/out resorting to force/harassment/authoritariansim.
Posted via D.Buzz
It's a difference of goals
Like so many "anti-" movements, the real goal isn't the stated one
They are only interested in not having their bag diluted/capital presentation, it has nothing to do with spam prevention or community quality, these are the virtuous goals given to the young enforcers who don't get realize the game
@snacky gave a good reply that is worth reviewing ☝️
Posted via D.BuzzTag: @steevc @jeffjagoe @frankbacon @adamada @coininstant @ackza.
WHoever this is needs to put a phone number and a physical address out there to EXPERIENCE what kind of REAL abuse can be thrown around.
I seriously need a call in line for this shit.
And im not letting vermin DICTATE anything of mine on the block.
yep, just a few plutocrats that enjoy using their stake to feel "in charge" of something for once in their life...
I am clearly not a fake account, I don't plagiarize or steal content, I don't harass users (I try my best to be kind to others here)... yet here I am, one of their primary targets as of late lol
“there doesn't have to be just one! Do you get it yet? Anyone can step up and do this, but it takes effort and exposes them”
no Steve, it doesn’t take effort. It simply takes stake. This is a plutocracy at its finest.
Stake. Ha. You don't need stake to make something impactful such as making statement. You need a voice.