Innacurate and outdated.
It's accurate, it is what you put in for, yes you changed it because it wasn't going to get apprroved.
A washed up Hiver selling your stake over time
I've only recently sold hive in ~8 years and I still have more than you, but I'll pretend you haven't been selling for ages. :strawman:
Hate INLEO and want to see it fail
I don't hate Leo, and I want it to succeed, I want 100 leos. What I don't want is bullshit.
It's inaccurate as many of your statements are. Clicking a link will show people how inaccurate it is, but nice try.
You don't have more than me on my other accounts, but sure push that false narrative too.
We continue to innovate and do everything in our power to bring in Hivers every day. That is the only narrative I care about and I will push out 10 more tech stacks & campaigns like "Join INLEO, Earn Dash" with Solana, Arbitrum, ChainFlip, ChainLink and many others which will bring in a new wave of adoption to Hive.
You can sit back and keep talking shit, you can give me some actual usable feedback. It doesn't matter. I will do this regardless.
As always, I'm open to constructive and useful feedback and closed to nonsense.
It's just not worth 460k to do this. I am not sure your exact mechanism of how it operates, but we already have the beneficiaries tag, L2 through hive-engine and soon csv, and if you are merely porting a private key to multiple wallets, the source code is already public domain.
Granted Trying to code a wallet or wallet functions from scratch may be niche, but once you learn the recipe it is rinse and repeat. And most wallet devs don't go even build from scratch because of the vulnerabilities-they modify what has already been tried and tested so the niche knowledge isn't required anyways. I just don't see the value, I just see that the chain is being screwed out of half a million dollars. It may be more fruitful than "valueplan", but we are still overpaying by at least a factor of 10.
We also have to examine the cost to onboard a new user. What are you really projective porting inleo to new chain users will return in active users? I hope it would be are more than this 10000 user figure on your past proposal, as that would be $46 per user. I don't really see that as being effective, and while it might increase the traffic on hive, the rewards being paid out in different currencies would have a liquidation effect on the hive rewards.
The burden is on you to justify the proposed expense.
As many things in this post, Marky’s statement is inaccurate. We’re not asking to $460k. The ask is ~$230k. I will be matching it with my own funds to get to $460k we need for these 10 partnerships
Please read the actual docs we posted and not Marky’s lies: https://peakd.com/me/proposals/332
You did initially ask for $460k but changed it because you realized it wasn't going to happen. Turn off the reality distortion field and talk honestly.
For those questioning that it was $460K like I just made it up. The actually number is $461,725, I actually rounded down.
Mark. You need help lol
Maybe spend less time with fake math and learn something for once.
331 * 695 = what?
If anyone buys any of the narrative you spin in your bullshit post, I feel sorry for them. Go do something productive buddy.
Yes, because you changed it.
Do you really believe your reality distortion field will make people believe you never asked for $1,256/day weeks before, realized there is no way it will pass and changed it to $695?
It's strange that in the post of the proposal itself he mentioned it was 480k, but it decreased... And here he keeps going in circles to avoid explaining that it changed.
You clearly don't pay attention to anything but your own bubble. Go outside and learn something. Perhaps one of the things will be the subject you're claiming to be an expert on but are actually the most ignorant in the room on.
Bye.
If you defense is to blow 230k of your own funds on a project that was said to cost [at least?] 10x what was necessary at 460k estimate, then perhaps you need to take a step back and realize someone might be trying to rob you specifically for 180k in services, on top of the additional $230k. You don't strike me as the type who is developing it from your own mental prowess given your own cash infusion, but a business type who recognized the value the project may bring, who may be getting screwed over bigly by a firm.
If you are familiar with coding, then try to set aside a week or two for yourself, to do one your own. From there, give the dev/firm hell and negotiate a for better price. You likely could threaten the firm to train a dev in house, may maybe pump out a new chain a week or faster, if they don't acquiesce to more reasonable pricing.