You say this here,
" If they want to set up clinics and try to get people to isolate with money given to the clinics voluntarily I'm fine with it."
...but you said this in the OP,
"...the county did state no taxpayer funds were used to purchase any of these products. Any of them purchased were done so with private funding."
So, your protest that giving the homeless free happy ending massage to persuade them to suffer voluntary captivity for this reason makes no sense.
That's my point.
I'm against inducing captivity, and note that the desperation of the banksters is such that they're using free beer as an inducement to be held as a captive.
I don't fret that the victims of their manipulation get free beer. I pity them that they'll trade their free agency for beer. I pity the nurses that they're job has become tempting the homeless with free beer to become slaves to the state. It's not what they signed up for, but they don't get to tell their employers how to spend that money. They either do what their employers want for the wages they're paid, or they find other work.
I found other work. So can they, so I don't pity them too much,eh?
The real story here isn't the duplicity of the hapless nurses, but of the banksters funding this charade. Free beer is a tell that the imposition of lockdown isn't due to medical reasons at all. If it's not for medical reasons, then why is it happening?
It's a global imposition of totalitarian tyranny, a political conquest, and that's what I oppose, and reckon you do as well. Free beer isn't the problem. It's symptomatic of a broken, common cored, hopeless society, and that's why we should oppose it.
Not because we don't approve of homeless people drinking beer and smoking weed, or nurses doing what they're told for their wages. This free beer and weed proves the cynical intent of the political forces imposing this lockdown, and you're missing that point by ranting about the nurses instead.
They're not in charge, and those that are need illuminating. Shine the daylight of dissent on the guilty parties, because I think that's what you actually want to do. I know it's what I follow you to see.
I must say I appreciate your thoughts. I have the the least amount of followers here on this platform than any. That being said you guys hold my feet to the fire better than any others. If I slip up on either side of things I usually get bitch slapped back in line. I still stand by my post. In the end my reasoning for the post was to shine a light on what you pointed out in your last comment. If it took your comments to get that done so be it.
"It's a global imposition of totalitarian tyranny, a political conquest, and that's what I oppose, and reckon you do as well. Free beer isn't the problem. It's symptomatic of a broken, common cored, hopeless society, and that's why we should oppose it."
That is the end game and I appreciate you stating it. It's through discourse like this that understanding is born. I appreciate you taking the time like others on this platform to make sure I understand the narrow line that the truth follows. We may not always agree on every little aspect but the underlying truth never waivers. That's the thing with truth.
Those are quotes from officials taken from articles about the situation. That's not me saying it. I'm pointing out what the officials said regarding the use of beer etc. and the facility.
My protest is against the system. I don't care if people want to drink, smoke whatever as long as it doesn't harm me. Believe me I understand that the people are all just pawns in the scheme including the nurses. I just thought the whole thing was ironic. Statists will justify the stealing of their money to pay for this stuff because of the possibility of helping them detox and live healthier. The ones doing the jobs just take the the easiest route to the desired end results. The people are fleeced while the banksters get all the richer and gain more control over us.
I agree with you. I pitty the ones trading their freedom for beer, cigarettes and or weed. I certainly don't blame them. They are the real victims in all this.
Ah, that was unclear from the formatting. When I quote an external source, I do as I did above quoting you, and also add a link. Had you done that, I might have managed to grasp you were quoting others and not expressing your personal outrage that nurses gave bums free beer and dope to convince them to remain captive.
However, when you keep referring to state, or public funds, being used for this, you are making it up, as far as I can tell. You state in the OP, as I point out, that private funds are paying for the party favors, not public purse.
Don't see much point in that, and do see plenty of reason not to make that false statement.
Understood, I have included all links to where the quotes came from. I new at actually writing a blog post like this so I appreciate the advice.
I deeply appreciate your passion for liberty. I am just as passionate for care to not misrepresent facts. Doing so always bites me in the ass. It's appropriate to note that it would be criminal to use public funds to buy bums Lambos to get them to remain captive, but it's not to say it was done if it wasn't.
Careful wording can be necessary to do the former without doing the latter.