and
side effects of Crispr 9-12I guess you should check China Brandolino's videos https://www.bitchute.com/video/cD8jwZpz8ryF/ (eng) and https://www.bitchute.com/video/C1Df2rQ1ZueR (Spanish)
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20241007/Overcoming-CRISPRs-side-effects-for-therapeutic-applications.aspx
https://www.dovepress.com/article/download/89805
https://www.progress.org.uk/genome-editing-in-human-embryos-has-unintended-side-effects/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28244-5
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/science/repair-with-gene-scissors-can-lead-to-new-genetic-defects/88023429
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20241205/Study-uncovers-dangerous-side-effects-of-AZD7648-in-gene-editing.aspx
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1143157/full
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-01942-4
https://www.ddw-online.com/scientists-discover-dangerous-side-effect-from-crispr-technique-32818-202412/
https://eu.idtdna.com/pages/community/blog/post/crispr-cas9-what-are-the-10-pros-and-7-cons
https://www.genengnews.com/news/crispr-cas9-adverse-effects-tackled-using-safeguard-sgrna-strategy/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-dark-side-of-crispr/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10182114/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/31/health/crispr-genetics-embryos.html
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/is-crispr-worth-the-risk
I even heard that stem cellls do in half way all on their own,
and
mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored? https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/13/5/719
i.e. I wouldn't bet on Crispr, you do what you believe in (and don't cause to much harm to yourself).
Sorry, for this a bit messy reply but I gues you can figure it ou anyway because I can't figure out out a way to correct it.
I think it's fairly straightforward, if not particularly aesthetically formatted.
As to CRISPR, if there are transfections of DNA, those transfections can be removed via CRISPR. There are multiple Cas mechanisms by which CRISPR can operate, literally thousands of different Cas systems various bacteria have devised, most of which mere humans haven't even begun to understand.
If there is any claim made that jab victims aren't human because of such transfections, removing them should eliminate any potential validity of any such claim. Further, if there is any claim that the transfected owe patent holders because of the involuntary transfections, removing the transfections eliminates any validity to any such claim - and also any harm or hazard such transfections may threaten.
Harms and hazards effected by the jabs that do not involve transfecting DNA need to be dealt with appropriately, which CRISPR is likely not the proper mechanism for.
Great citations of source. I really appreciate the research you have undertaken that informs you and enabled you to provide me this information.
Thanks very much!