You can never lose an argument. You think I sit around thinking this stuff up but I don't. A person took in a friend after they became disabled. The friend filed for disability. He ended up getting SSI, they deducted $314.00 from his monthly SSI payment of nine hundred some dollars. They said he derived value from her providing him a place and taking care of him. Feeding someone derives value. At least to the government. But keep calling me a liar.
I said if I had thousands laying around, as in enough that I wouldn't have anything better to do with it other than fling it into a chance something might or might not come of it. It wouldn't so much matter that my word means nothing out on a blog platform as it would to help bolster my complaint that they misrepresent themselves to the public, openly, blatantly, of which they cannot do. I don't have thousands laying around with nothing better to do with it, so it's just worthless conjecture for you to assume I'd lose my house over it. I don't have a mortgage either. I have an equity loan but nothing big enough to sweat about as I have good enough credit to switch that over to an unsecured loan if I had to.
You receiving something of value in exchange for something of value, is derived value according to the government. Your argument is like the guy who insist he didn't commit the crime but is guilty as hell. I don't make the rules, nor do I apply them, or agree with them, but, overall, the bigger shock will come when they digitalize everything on an open chain and proceed to ask that person peddling for money on a street corner how it is he spends more money than he gets.
Good point. That's because I'm never wrong.
I didn't. I pointed out I'd lost mine, and explained how.
It depends who he is. If he's the right beggar, they'll never ask.
I think Catherine Austin Fitts said it best the other night in a video. "You can't go off and barter when they have Space X and Starlink going off above your head and they're targeting your head with electronic weapons. That takes real imagination. Elon Musk who seems to be so popular right now, wants to put a mesh network in the back of your head and hook you up to a satellite. Why is anyone in American wanting to listen to someone who want to do that."
She's more intelligent than I could even assume to be, yet she's not to far off from where several months ago, when Musk was seeking to purchase twitter, someone wrote similarly what he was really after. That was to get into the algorithms behind twitter that kept people who post on twitter identifies hidden. His goal, it was said, was to put enough satellites up where he could track any tweet from anywhere in the world within five minutes. Something the experts said was statistically impossible to accomplish. Catherine's at the point Musk will just give you a good old zap to the head no matter what corner your sitting on taking up money from passerby's. You don't get those forms filled out, he'll just zap you from the earth. Now if I'd said that, you'd be ripping two ways to Sunday on me. I've was just figuring he'd send you a reminder tweet.
Though it's obvious that someone like Catherine, who has never really cared much about what she tells on the government(s), shows how much the world has become afraid of Trump, when speaking on the missing trillions, at the end of the video, she said something along the lines of let's just hope Trump can get it figured out. That is so laughable, a man who was living off the borrowed dime off his assets, his family now, after only four years of holding office, multi billionaires in hard cash. You know she isn't really that gullible.
No I wouldn't. I'm right there with you, in fact. Otherwise I'd be ripping on your right now.
Yes. But hope springs eternal. Humanity cannot help but hope for whatever can enable them to persist through whatever challenge we face. ~64k Starlink satellites surveilling us, tanks rolling into our village, sabertooths leaping from cover, whatever we face we envision means of surmounting it. This is a key capacity that has resulted in our survival, because we're not always wrong.