My understanding is that pseudouridination of mRNA is done to prevent mRNA from being quickly metabolized, and this causes it to continue to hijack cells to produce spike proteins. Blood from vaccinated persons is likely to contain spike proteins indefinitely, and thus is dangerous to anyone receiving it, because spike proteins are toxic. This doesn't even take into account the myriad claims that there are self-assembling nanotechnological devices besides the mRNA in LNP's (Lipid NanoParticles), which today are being alleged to be destroyed by nicotine. With no peer reviewed research into such nanotech devices in the jabs, I am unable to confirm they are there, but there is damn sure a lot of research into such devices and any other means of testing them on people would cost many $M's, at least, so I lean towards those claims being credible, just on economic grounds. There are sure no ethical barriers to pharmaceutical companies injecting people with anything.
Were I him I'd stick to purebloods for my transfusion sources.
I have Charles Leibers patents on nano tech use that when inserted into the cells can tell how old someone is, if someone has a disease, etc., if you want to go over it. Take me a minute to find it, have to go back a little ways, to 2020 stuff I saved, if I remember correctly.
You've done excellent research into Lieber, IIRC, and such development is exactly what I refer to above being all but impossible to test in live people by any other mechanism than the jabs, albeit covertly and criminally.
There was a few years ago reports that they had come up with the technology to be able to track schizophrenia patients as to if they were taking their meds on time. Such a technology that they could remotely monitor these patients living independent was from having digested pills. Its been a few years since I read an article on it. When all the accusations of metal shapes being found in people's bodies from the jabs I tried looking for it but couldn't find it.
You want solid proof you say you can't find, I have it via the horses mouth, I believe it was the Astra Zeneca head I wrote in one of my ops that openly admitted that the mRNA was capable of sending messages to the body. I'll see if I can find which op over the next couple days, get the exact quote, it was a guy from Cyrus and himself who were overjoyed by this new technology, why wouldn't they be considering it could be used as a bioweapon for attack on western civilization.
That's been invented long ago. It's called 'medication time' when patients are given their meds by nurses.
In fact mRNA is a message to the body. It's instructions on how to build proteins. Now, if you can get a message to send a message, you'd have something else besides mRNA. It's getting pretty recursive, though.
Noubar Afeyan explains the promise of messenger RNA by comparing it to the more controversial concept of changing an individuals DNA. He notes changes to the DNA can be essentially permanent, like hardware. By contrast messenger RNA is more like software: it can be used to perform a task and then can be programmed to disappear.
Wow, lookie there Ralph, two messages in one shot. Eat your words.
You eat them. You're putting them in my mouth. Doing a job is what mRNA does, and disappear is what things do when they're done. You're getting senile or summat.
Go look at Liebers patents, it can distinguish differences in cells, so it has to be a multiple messenger.