Blocking FSH May Reduce Body Fat Levels and Increase Bone Density In Menopause

in #medicine8 years ago (edited)


Introduction


I have previously discussed how brown fat and beige fat may actually be important in helping us to control our weight and reduce overall body fat levels.

ThinkstockPhotos-542799332.jpg

FSH is a pituitary hormone.

You can read my post on the subject here.

Regular "white" fat cells store energy and aren't very active.

On the other hand brown and beige fat cells use a lot of energy at rest and can help to use up stored fat.

They seem to be important for thermogenesis (heat production) and certain techniques such as controlled exposure to cold temperatures (e.g. cold showers) may increase levels of these fat types.

A new study in Nature by Liu et al [1] suggests that blocking a hormone (FSH) using an antibody may increase the levels of beige/brown fat (fat browning) and may also increase bone mass.


The Idea Behind this Study


FSH (Follicular Stimulating Hormone) is a pituitary hormone that has a number of functions relating to sexual function. There is a nice summary on the Wikipedia page.

ThinkstockPhotos-508290722.jpg

FSH rises around menopause.

Amongst these effects is a relationship to the levels of sex hormones with a feedback loop - so if sex hormone levels fall, FSH levels rise to bring them back up.

It appears that as women enter menopause and their oestrogen levels fall the levels of FSH rise in order to try to stimulate more ovarian production of this type of hormone.

Since the ovaries are no longer active this doesn't work so the levels of FSH stay high (there is no increase in oestrogen levels to feedback and normalise the FSH).

"Previous human studies and particularly the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), an observational cohort of pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women followed for a decade, have suggested that a phase of rapid bone loss ensues two to three years before the onset of menopause, when FSH levels are rising and oestrogen levels are relatively stable.

Furthermore, even after the onset of menopause, oestrogen replacement therapy does not always suppress serum FSH levels into the premenopausal range, and women often continue to lose bone and further accrue visceral fat."

ThinkstockPhotos-532208617.jpg

Menopause can result in decreased bone density and increased fat levels.

So, the authors of this study were basically wondering if these effects might in some way be related directly to the raised levels of FSH.

They decided to test this by creating an antibody which blocks it. They then carried out a number of studies in mice to see what effects the antibody would have.

A number of different methods were used to confirm this and I would suggest reading the paper for the detailed information as there is just too much to cover here.

Unfortunately the paper is not open access and I don't want to get in trouble for posting too much specific information.

(Lack of open access is a topic I have previously discussed a couple of times and you can read more here.


The Findings


ThinkstockPhotos-625302208.jpg

White fat cells.

Overall from the multiple experiments that were done, there were 2 main findings. Blocking FSH using the antibody:

  1. Reduced fat levels with a corresponding increase in beige fat tissue.

  2. Increased bone mass.

So it does seem that blocking FSH increases browning of white fat (the conversion of white fat into brown/beige fat) and it also seems to increase bone density.


Problems


As always there are problems with this kind of research:

ThinkstockPhotos-466405279.jpg

Can these results be replicated in humans?

  1. Tiny sample sizes - this is often the case in studies of this sort and in this case the samples vary from 2-5 mice.

  2. Mice are not humans.

  3. Unforeseen consequences of FSH blockade.

  4. Application to males?

  5. Other Issues.


ThinkstockPhotos-502858496.jpg

Tiny is not good when it comes to sample sizes.

1) Tiny Sample Sizes

The tiny sample sizes are an obvious problem that we encounter quite regularly in this kind of biological research.

Unless we get further confirmation with larger sample sizes we cannot be sure that there were not anomalies or oddities in the particular mice that were used here.


2) Mice Are Not Humans

ThinkstockPhotos-639064242.jpg

Mice are not humans.

Basically just because something works in mice does not necessarily mean it works in humans.

This has been especially true with previous research regarding obesity - for example the hormone leptin seemed to initially suggest an effective target for treating obesity in mice studies but it never really seemed to work the same way in humans.

This is a common issue. Over time and in different species the effects and relationships of certain hormones can change and become subtly modified.

It may be that something similar applies to FSH in humans. The only way to know for sure would be to test an FSH antibody in humans.


ThinkstockPhotos-465076975 (1).jpg

Unforeseen consequences?

3) Unforeseen/Unknown Effects


In view of the above there may also be unforeseen consequences of FSH suppression in menopausal woman that we don't yet understand.

This is one of the things that people often lose sight of when there is excitement over a new finding.


4) Application to Males?


In some of the tests here both male and female mice were used and it seems the effects applied to both.

ThinkstockPhotos-610450660 (1).jpg

Is this useful for men?

This may be a problem in humans though. Although sex hormone levels in men fall with age too, there is no definite "menopause" such as that which occurs in women.

It is not clear what the actual effect would be of FSH blockade in human male subjects.

I don't think men would be happy to have their testosterone or other androgen release potentially suppressed as a means to lose weight.

Further the authors themselves cite previous research that suggests that androgens themselves may have a browning affect on white fat.

Suppression of androgen release by FSH blockade may therefore be counterproductive in men.

To be fair the main suggestion in this paper is to use the technique in menopausal women though. As always further understanding of the mechanisms at play here may help to clarify these issues.


5) Other Issues?

ThinkstockPhotos-502815936.jpg

Glucose and lipid levels unaffected?

Another point I found interesting and which was only briefly covered was that there did not appear to be corresponding changes to other metabolic markers like blood glucose and blood lipids despite the increases in fat browning.

This is not consistent with previous research I have read but it is hard to say how relevant this is in such a small study.

It could be related to the major issues of small sample size and inability to transfer animal results to humans, or it could be due to some other reason.


Conclusion


This is certainly interesting preliminary research. I think the role of FSH in obesity and metabolic syndromes may well turn out to be greater than had previously been presumed.

ThinkstockPhotos-492363909.jpg

Could FSH teach us more about the mechanisms of obesity?

The problem is that we won't really know more until we get some replication of these results in humans.

That will take time and there are a variety of issues. First of all more animal studies will need to be done.

Tiny sample sizes mean that we can't read too much into what is presented here without actual replication.

Even then there will be ethical and safety hurdles as we do not know for sure what the effects of FSH blockade would be in otherwise "healthy" post-menopausal women.

The question of whether this could be used in men too is also still up for debate.

If it does pan out the potential for new treatments based on this are great.

As the authors state in their discussion:

A humanized Hf2 or its equivalent may not only be efficacious in reducing visceral and subcutaneous fat in people, but might also provide benefit for certain medical conditions associated with visceral adiposity, such as metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Previous anti-obesity drugs have been pretty lacklustre in their results and in many cases they have major side effects.

A potentially safe drug without long term negative effects would be a huge advancement, even if it could only be used in menopausal women.


References


  1. Liu, Peng, Yaoting Ji, Tony Yuen, Elizabeth Rendina-Ruedy, Victoria E. DeMambro, Samarth Dhawan, Wahid Abu-Amer, et al. 2017. “Blocking FSH Induces Thermogenic Adipose Tissue and Reduces Body Fat.” Nature 546 (7656): 107–12.

Thank you for reading





Steemithelp.net

Are you new to Steemit and Looking for Answers?

Please visit:

Steemithelp.net

A collection of guides and tutorials that cover the basics of Steem and Steemit.


Follow me Steemit,Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Medium. Join the Steemit Group on LinkedIn.

All uncredited images are taken from my personal Thinkstock Photography account. More information can be provided on request.


Sort:  

Interesting article @thecryptofiend I guess we would all like to lose weight if there was a easier solution but it seems more research needs to be done I also wouldn't want testosterone or any other androgen release that may potentially suppressed ones libido as a way to lose weight.

Absolutely. This may point to further research that might explain some of the mechanisms of obesity more but I don't think it will be directly applicable.

and thats why I fail science class

Lol :)

See also the benefits of sleeping in the month of fasting
https://steemit.com/bulan/@sayedmahdaly/sleep-benefits-while-fasting

Wheather I'm a little chubby or thin, I'm gonna shrink no matter what. ☹️

I think we all are! Hopefully technology will allow it to be reduced or even stopped. One of the big problems in both older women and men is falls and the subsequent risk of major fractures like hip fractures - it can sometimes result in a cascade of issues that greatly shorten life. Just reducing the risk would be a great help.

Yeah, that's scary to think about. My grandfather actually suffered a fall some years ago and had to get hip surgery. He had to give up smoking and he exercises daily with my grandmother. He's in his 80's and pretty happy for a grump.

Just looking for some information to help with the shrinkage!

As a MD i did not expect steemit to form a part of my daily medical research. keep up the good work!

A really good read thank you for sharing.

Indeed! But I don't know much about hormones running is my best friend ;)

Exercise is almost always good! I'm too fat to be any good at running but I love walking and hiking in scenic places.

It's wise choice because if you have extra weight then it will ruin your knees. Walking and hiking is good. You can try running very slowly on well cushioned surface like grass

Yes true - the extra wear and tear would destroy them.

I've seen you do very good post congratulations, follow me and help me please

I like the "Problems" part. Seems to be always the same (and you can probably also include: 'estimating correctly the error on the results').

Glad to read again your posts (I was away) :)

A very interesting post dear friend @thecryptofiend, more and more people are interested in everything that has to do with weight, it is public knowledge that this disease affect people from all over the world and now on children, many Thanks for sharing this stuff
you have a good day.

I doubt this can get to human trials, so many obstacles to overcome. Yet, this could be revolutionary if proven true.

That is a risk. I think blocking FSH is too big a hormonal adjustment to deal with and it will be unlikely that it will be without problems. I think instead it is likely this research will lead on to more specific mechanisms and routes for tackling the issue.

exactly and there might be other factors like pregnancy and health of the subject that would need to be considered too. as long as there are good takeaways, this study can be termed successful. thank you for sharing, this is an interesting article!

Well the initial idea is use in post menopausal/menopausal women so pregnancy would only come into it if it was extended out to other age groups. I'm not sure it will get that far given the broad effects that FSH has for exactly that reason. Obviously men don't get pregnant but it is also a broad switching hormone with a variety of reproductive and other effects in both genders which I think would pose a problem in that case too.

Thank you for sharing the article with us, I am always looking to better understand the pituitary gland.

I can't lie. I find it damn hard to lose weight. This drug sounds very interesting indeed. Possible light at the end of the tunnel? It seems there is some hope at least, lol.

Let's pray for the compatibility factor for the guys after some more trials!

Thanks for making me feel a load lot better after reading your article, my bro! :)

Me too! Sadly I don't think this FSH blocker will be useful (at least not in men) but this research might lead to other solutions.

Well, as long as R&D are doing their bit, I'm not complaining! :)

Congratulations @thecryptofiend! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honnor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

If you want to support the SteemitBoard project, your upvote for this notification is welcome!

@thecryptofiend That's good to know! I'll definitely be eating healthier now haha!