I don’t see anything wrong in upvoting yourself. Everyone has the right to promote his/ her post.
There are few people who joined this platform to earn some extra money.
We have also noticed the when people don’t have large network they can’t get much upvotes on their posts. I think instead of criticize on self-voting the emphasis should be given towards quality of content.
As a quality post always contribute towards the value addition of the platform.
However, you have to see what your vote worth is. If you have good voting power you upvote yourself.
You can also join different platform like musing to increase your earning.
Some bot can also be helpful in this regard.
Why not? I you had valuable power and that's power is going to waste. For that it is the est use to upvote your own quality content post. But remember your post must be a quality content post not plagiarism,copy post. Be careful about it. You also use bid-bots to get profit. It also helpful for you.
That depends on a few different things. Do you find your content valuable? Do you feel the need to reward yourself for doing something? Do you expect a certain return on your stake weighted investment to the platform (if you made any investment)? If the answer to any of these are yes, then you may want to upvote your own post.
Many of us tend to not upvote our own content and use our voting power to reward others. That's strictly a personal preference and by no means a rule or mandatory thing. I didn't vote any of my own content for most of the last year and just trusted others to vote on my content if they felt it or I added value to the platform, but recently I started following a trail to help decentralize the chain more than I was before. If the trail votes on me then I end up voting on myself anyway because I follow that trail.
Ultimately it's just up to you to decide what you want to do with your own vote and whether or not you want to reward other users or yourself.
There is no clear answer to this question, but rather up to each and everyone. I always upvote my own posts, but rarely my own comments. Some people hate it when people upvote their own content, but most people think it's okay. So just do what you are comfortable with, and what you think is ethical.
It depends on your vote value. If you are a minnow, with a vote value less then 0.01, there is no real reason to upvote your own posts. It will not help any. If you want to grow, bots are the best way to do it. Different bots have different plans, ROIs, etc. For example, my bot, @KiwiBot, offers a 0.10 upvote on every post you create for 1 month in exchange for 1 STEEM. You would have to pay an initial amount, but you would eventually make an ROI, and make money after the ROI period. Unless you can find followers another way, bots are the best way to grow.
No. Now the blockchain doesn't reward curation for anyone who upvote their own content. Its just a waste of you voting power and any reward you get from curation is returned to the reward pool again.
Yes, that tells you the exact opposite of what you claimed. When anyone votes on the 0 minute mark, 100 % of the rewards goes to the author, so of course it's beneficial to vote for yourself as soon as possible. However, if you vote for someone else, then it's best to wait until 30 minutes has passed, so you get maximum curation reward.
In the upcoming hardfork, this will be changed, and at this point it's most beneficial to vote for yourself at the 15 minute mark. At that point you get 100 % of the rewards for your upvote.
No worries! Everyone can make mistakes, and I just wanted to correct it so that people don't believe that they will not gain anything by upvoting themselves.
Yes ,you have upvote your post but your your upvote will counted but you will not get the credit of that because of the reputation you have scored .so I always tell everyone in my group that first you increase the reputation score then only you will be able to get good earning so I always been getting upvote.
If your reputation score in steemit is above 50 then you will give upvote to yourself post then you will see some dollars in your post so for they please increase the reputation score in steemit.
It upon you if you wish you can upvote your post if you love your content and it has some realistic words then my answer is yes you can upvote your post. As everyone is doing the same if they have better voting power people themselves upvote and start making money and make their post in trending.
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
I don’t see anything wrong in upvoting yourself. Everyone has the right to promote his/ her post.
There are few people who joined this platform to earn some extra money.
We have also noticed the when people don’t have large network they can’t get much upvotes on their posts. I think instead of criticize on self-voting the emphasis should be given towards quality of content.
As a quality post always contribute towards the value addition of the platform.
However, you have to see what your vote worth is. If you have good voting power you upvote yourself.
You can also join different platform like musing to increase your earning.
Some bot can also be helpful in this regard.
Why not? I you had valuable power and that's power is going to waste. For that it is the est use to upvote your own quality content post. But remember your post must be a quality content post not plagiarism,copy post. Be careful about it. You also use bid-bots to get profit. It also helpful for you.
That depends on a few different things. Do you find your content valuable? Do you feel the need to reward yourself for doing something? Do you expect a certain return on your stake weighted investment to the platform (if you made any investment)? If the answer to any of these are yes, then you may want to upvote your own post.
Many of us tend to not upvote our own content and use our voting power to reward others. That's strictly a personal preference and by no means a rule or mandatory thing. I didn't vote any of my own content for most of the last year and just trusted others to vote on my content if they felt it or I added value to the platform, but recently I started following a trail to help decentralize the chain more than I was before. If the trail votes on me then I end up voting on myself anyway because I follow that trail.
Ultimately it's just up to you to decide what you want to do with your own vote and whether or not you want to reward other users or yourself.
Yes .... No
Truth is unless you are a mega big Orca or Whale and post like 100% - 10 times a day, It does not really matter if you do or don't
What matters is 101 other things like you content, your community, your contribution, your originality, etc.
View this answer on Musing.io
There is no clear answer to this question, but rather up to each and everyone. I always upvote my own posts, but rarely my own comments. Some people hate it when people upvote their own content, but most people think it's okay. So just do what you are comfortable with, and what you think is ethical.
It depends on your vote value. If you are a minnow, with a vote value less then 0.01, there is no real reason to upvote your own posts. It will not help any. If you want to grow, bots are the best way to do it. Different bots have different plans, ROIs, etc. For example, my bot, @KiwiBot, offers a 0.10 upvote on every post you create for 1 month in exchange for 1 STEEM. You would have to pay an initial amount, but you would eventually make an ROI, and make money after the ROI period. Unless you can find followers another way, bots are the best way to grow.
No. Now the blockchain doesn't reward curation for anyone who upvote their own content. Its just a waste of you voting power and any reward you get from curation is returned to the reward pool again.
This is straight up wrong! You do absolutely get curation reward for upvoting your own content.
I think I read it in the steamblog update.
it is an unfair advantage for users who curate thier own content when posting and stuff.
https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/blockchain-update-3-hardfork-20-and-release-19-4-appbase-statsd-and-rocksdb
Yes, that tells you the exact opposite of what you claimed. When anyone votes on the 0 minute mark, 100 % of the rewards goes to the author, so of course it's beneficial to vote for yourself as soon as possible. However, if you vote for someone else, then it's best to wait until 30 minutes has passed, so you get maximum curation reward.
In the upcoming hardfork, this will be changed, and at this point it's most beneficial to vote for yourself at the 15 minute mark. At that point you get 100 % of the rewards for your upvote.
Sorry for the mistake. Stay in touch.
No worries! Everyone can make mistakes, and I just wanted to correct it so that people don't believe that they will not gain anything by upvoting themselves.
thanks for pointing out.
Yes ,you have upvote your post but your your upvote will counted but you will not get the credit of that because of the reputation you have scored .so I always tell everyone in my group that first you increase the reputation score then only you will be able to get good earning so I always been getting upvote.
If your reputation score in steemit is above 50 then you will give upvote to yourself post then you will see some dollars in your post so for they please increase the reputation score in steemit.
It upon you if you wish you can upvote your post if you love your content and it has some realistic words then my answer is yes you can upvote your post. As everyone is doing the same if they have better voting power people themselves upvote and start making money and make their post in trending.
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io