can it be possible that those in the ultimate power do not like that and all of a sudden now there's an even more powerful version of the virus floating around in those states? In reality if this was really about a great reset then someone(s) deliberately release this virus? Right? If one virus isn't enough why not two? three? four?
This scenario assumes that everything can be controlled: Viruses like humans like plants, animals, etc.
Do you believe that people can produce such excellent bioweapons that exactly match their own targets and hit exactly what they hope to hit?
I mean, really think about it: If you think such a thing is possible, what would be the job of the scientist hired to do it? Invent a virus that is deadly but doesn't kill everyone? It should only be very dangerous for the over 80s, but not for children or younger people? And then this agent tries it and fiddles around with rats and other mammals, when they get infected and how, what other conditions have to be there for the respective chosen old animals to die selectively, or how? In the process, of course, this so-called researcher also knows which of his experimental animals are pre-diseased, whether they have particular weaknesses or strengths, and he tinkers on and on until he finally claims to have found the right cocktail. Thereupon he is rewarded and then others come along who go off and .... and ...
what do they do? They inject themselves (haha) or are they secret agents among the doctors who inject small children and sick people without anyone knowing about this new cocktail? Or do they inject some animals and hope that they will infect people? How would such a deliberately manufactured virus actually be circulated?
So my guess is: not at all. Firstly, because I don't believe in the infallibility of virus research, and secondly, because it would basically be too much trouble to produce something like this reliably without masses of human subjects; animal experiments or not.
On the other hand, it is much easier to pretend that there is a deadly virus, hammer penetratingly and consistently into people's heads that we are dealing with a plague and they will believe it, so bombarded by the media. Then, subsequently, give them a vaccination and millions of volunteers emerge to accompany the latest human experiment.
Can all this be "on purpose"? I don't know and I don't actually think so. I guess it has to do with how we modern humans believe in threats and technology nowadays. Those ones, who have the power and means to do what they think is right, indeed may think that what they do is humanly correct. They believe their own stories and may fear overpopulation, environmental pollution and that man destroys his own habitat. Now, inwardly those characters or parts of their personalities think that they must do something about these miseries. Save the world from what they think is a threat.
Only, nothing will come of it, just as it did before the experiment, as incidentally with all so-called cures that are supposed to bring salvation, that is, once and for all, and promise to eradicate something. These things change absolutely nothing about the fact that people die, with and without prior illness, unpredictably and unexpectedly, just as they do not die even though they are old or ill. What remains is the eternal fact that the old die more than the young.
But a mass death that is supposed to be caused by a virus alone is not realistic, because there is hardly anything on earth that causes such unilateral deaths in masses. The masses have always died because people have helped them along, through warfare, the use of machine fire and bombs, prison camps, the denial of shelter and food. Once whole peoples are plunged into misfortune, they are weakened and beaten (physically or mentally), their zest for life, their courage is at an all-time low, their biological as well as spiritual powers weaken, mass deaths seem to occur.
The fact that, for example, soldiers died at the time of the Spanish flu, at a time when millions of people were still stuck in filthy war trenches shooting at other people, millions were killed in combat and exposed to deadly gases, etc., is something people seem to forget when they talk about viruses and their omnipotence to kill.
and ... maybe modern people are so bored that they need and want something exciting, a new threat which kind of gives them something "meaningful" to do. "Saving lives" or "reduce egoism" or whatever.
It would be difficult but not impossible in gain of function research. You don't need as deadly a virus to kill off older people or those with severe illness as you would someone younger. It would seem logical if you wanted to produce such a virus then you'd find a cure first to immunize those you wouldn't want infected. We've know all along that hydroxychloroquine works not only to minimize serious illness but acts like a prophylactic to prevent one from getting the disease. The whole concept behind gain of function research is to enhance the most deadliest viruses you could find in nature so you can research a cure gaining an upper hand on the virus. If you didn't want people dropping dead by the millions you could control the amount of people it effected by enhancing the virus to be more deadlier. The kind of people that'd work a gain of function research as an objective to kill people would be people with a total disregard for human life, like the Chinese. Why would China want to do something of that nature is rather simple, to topple world governments to become the world's economic powerhouse. They've also been collecting human DNA of different races for years. I am not saying for one hundred percent sure that's what was or has been going on but I am convinced this virus came out of a lab and was not found in nature as it currently stands.
I share part of your assumptions, not all, but it may not be necessary if there are ways of understanding and mutual tolerance that make us as common people stick together and not oppose each other. I accept the fear of a virus as the truth of others, only it is not mine. This could probably be debated for eternity, as philosophers have debated with the public for millennia, and no end in sight. The extent to which other states are our enemies and even feel motivated to see such things fuelled is also due to how domestic and foreign media write and report about the "new power states", indeed, how each individual perceives that we are caught up in something like an international competition. This aspect is also part of the propaganda machine, not always explicitly, but implicitly. As long as the enemy is dubbed outside our own national borders, the population will also bow to what the state apparatus suggests: That we have no choice but to submit and best obey the rolling dominations of an economic nature.
But what do the Chinese, the Germans or the Indians really think about each other as people, as part of a culture, when they have the chance to push aside the filter of media content? For me, the Chinese are a people like any other, neither are they my enemies nor my friends, I am not emotionally attached to them, but I infer from my life to their lives and in general there is certainly little difference in that they want to live, love and work in peace.
So instead of listening as a people to neither Chinese nor German nor American propaganda, we could turn a deaf ear and realise that we are not the tools of the powerful if we don't want to be.
For me, the realisation is slowly crystallising that rulers who always want to locate and condemn the enemy are merely looking for convincing justifications for measures that will make it easy to change the paradigm and bring an entire populace onto a course they want. The fact that dictators might only be found abroad, but not at home, has been in question since the Corona affair at the latest.
So, I would ask you, if you do not also think that your own government/international corporations are collecting your DNA and the rest of your humanly data? Where is the difference between a chinese and a german government?
Doesn't it sadden you to see how we ordinary people are now working against each other instead of finding ways to free ourselves from coercion and control?
I therefore wish you personally freedom and a form of peace that I wish for all people. But I will oppose those who make it too easy for themselves to abuse the current rules for their own preferences and also to over-interpret them, as is happening with the masks.
I have just finished a difficult phone call and correspondence with one of my contractors who dismissed me because of my mask exemption and I am therefore facing the almost out of my professional and financial existence. I fought it and wouldn't have had to if she had accepted the exemption, as the law states, where people with exemption don't have to wear masks. But she didn't. And such shows that people feel in the right when the rest of the fellow citizens duck, bend and also harass people walking outside without masks because somewhere there is a mask order for certain districts.
But now I also know that everyone has their own limit and not everyone goes into resistance at the same time. It's an evolving thing and only when people can't move personally and feel cornered do they start to resist. Where there are still ways out and diplomatic skills, where there are niches or shelters, they are used.
All the best for you.
The Great Reset crowd are all about control. They want to control everything. People who want to control don't release an uncontrollable deadly contagion--instead they have their media brainwash everyone into believing it exists--then they can control the whole scenario.
Yes, I think that too.
What keeps you sane these days?
To keep my sanity: my daily activist artwork/covid cartoons and the protest rallies/marches--being with others who are wide awake and know this is a scamdemic--I can be normal with them, they are like a support group. Also I am a member of Vaccine Choice Canada and they act as a activist support group for me as well.
Yes, I can relate to that normality. I truly long for an undisturbed sight of humans: uncovered, free spirited and not under fear. I myself , though without mask, am afraid that I must look sad and tired to my environment for I can feel and see the impacts of the whole last year. I depend on people, on social contact, and I know it and not defend it.
What people who neither outwardly nor inwardly work with the conflict do not realize that every encounter where people make it difficult to easily follow the new rules, they actually also work for those, wo still don't feel the consequences or don't want to see them. But who knows, one never truly has knowledge about the silent resistances and the given support from those who outwardly comply but not inwardly. And wo hold the places for their friends and relatives who became or will become dependent on their support.