I don't see anything in your comment that even suggests it is worthy of being written. In fact why on earth did you bother Are you a contentious sort that trawls about looking for a response? Perhaps she wasnt looking to present a dry factual list of details and instead was portraying a feeling and an emotion derived from her experience.
I felt it.
I had a look at your blog. In your poem of two days ago did
my feet become teutonic plates
Teutonic? As in of the old Germanic people? How peculiar. I think you meant tectonic? As a result I didn't feel it deserved an upvote
I love you. Haha, I just finished responding to that. No worries, I will not be crying into my beer over it ;) (there was no name, or sign, since it didn't even have an entrance...lol!)
Hehe, Love ya back lady :O)
i opened this article because the tags and title [Sneaking Through a Back Lawn to Document a Creepy Broken Down Caretaker's house and Centuries Old Cemetery--(Don't miss the surreal pictures at the end)], suggested something creepy and surreal. neither of those two things are evident. nor did he/she take much effort to document the caretakers house nor really the cemetery. how can you "document" without a bare minimum of facts? the article did not deliver. I do not actually often comment on such. that i do so now speaks for itself.
I think the very act of not voting in itself is enough. I think it is a subjective matter and depends on your expectation of document. Some may expect a plethora of detail... Others, pictures and text that describe the emotions that a person experiences.
Did you mean Tectonic? :O)
meesterboom i did not mean to start some trolling war here. i offered my comments as a reflection to the author because I was disappointed in the quality of the work when drawn in by the title. personally i would have searched out more information. creepy is subjective. quality itself is subjective. i agree on this. peace out.
Peace it is!
agreed. i deserve a fail on that.