while your photos are ok, i dont find anything creepy there as much as neglected. this is not quite the same. as you didn't incorporate the least bit of data in this post...name or location of cemetery, close up of a headstone with legible clarity, history of the graveyard... i really don't feel as if it deserves an upvote.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't see anything in your comment that even suggests it is worthy of being written. In fact why on earth did you bother Are you a contentious sort that trawls about looking for a response? Perhaps she wasnt looking to present a dry factual list of details and instead was portraying a feeling and an emotion derived from her experience.
I felt it.
I had a look at your blog. In your poem of two days ago did
my feet become teutonic plates
Teutonic? As in of the old Germanic people? How peculiar. I think you meant tectonic? As a result I didn't feel it deserved an upvote
I love you. Haha, I just finished responding to that. No worries, I will not be crying into my beer over it ;) (there was no name, or sign, since it didn't even have an entrance...lol!)
Hehe, Love ya back lady :O)
i opened this article because the tags and title [Sneaking Through a Back Lawn to Document a Creepy Broken Down Caretaker's house and Centuries Old Cemetery--(Don't miss the surreal pictures at the end)], suggested something creepy and surreal. neither of those two things are evident. nor did he/she take much effort to document the caretakers house nor really the cemetery. how can you "document" without a bare minimum of facts? the article did not deliver. I do not actually often comment on such. that i do so now speaks for itself.
I think the very act of not voting in itself is enough. I think it is a subjective matter and depends on your expectation of document. Some may expect a plethora of detail... Others, pictures and text that describe the emotions that a person experiences.
Did you mean Tectonic? :O)
meesterboom i did not mean to start some trolling war here. i offered my comments as a reflection to the author because I was disappointed in the quality of the work when drawn in by the title. personally i would have searched out more information. creepy is subjective. quality itself is subjective. i agree on this. peace out.
Peace it is!
agreed. i deserve a fail on that.
Since creepy is obviously quite subjective I'm certainly not going to argue the point. There was no name, no sign--no entrance as I did state, though I will now add the no name part, thanks for pointing that out.
I disagree about the legible headstones, I can read the stones of the fifth and sixth pictures perfectly, as well as one in the last four pictures, though if you are on a small phone that would make a difference since I'm on a laptop.
If the word document is the issue, no problem I will change the word to capture.
Ha, okay, no problem I shall survive your critique and lack of vote. Hope you have a lovely day :)