I like your line of questioning @fknmayhem. It's good to not bilndly support proposals.
I also like @themagazine seems to have answered any doubts you had about the project. I would suggest however that the proposals be collected via comments under a weekly proposal post, rather than on Discord. Let's keep it on-chain.
Also, how about making the Categories more UpLifting for Humanity by perhaps grouping together Sports, Movies and TV & Music under just One Entertainment Category, and adding Categories such as Good Causes, Positive News and Natural Health. There could be sub-categories under the main heading if that helped people more easily find what they are looking for.
@fknmayhem Did you support the proposal in the end?
Thanks for your comment.
No, I didn't support the proposal because I don't think it deserves any support. While I like the "curated newsletter" approach - and subscribe to quite some myself - I think this has most impact if off-site off chain. Then my question would be whether OP has the reach to get traction to such a concept.
Beyond that, while AFAIK no curation project has organized in a similar way, there are tools available for curators and those who go the distance will also be able to grow their curation power to make a difference. Especially considering that OP set out from a not-for-profit approach.
Personally, I only look for proposals which improve the chain, add critical/highly popular tools, or are aimed at user acquisition.
I found this proposal rather frivolous tbh. But "frivolous" meant in a jovial way. :)
Sory, but not understanding your abbreviations OP and AFAIK
@atma.love it never received a reply and you certainly know about it now, just like google can tell you, but let it be so for clarity:
AFAIK => As Far As I Know
OP => Original Poster, person who made the Original Post (which is also abbreviated OP by the way)
Thanks.
Posted via D.Buzz
!ENGAGE 20
ENGAGEtokens.