You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @themagazine: a simple and concrete proposal to enhance the contents and authors of Hive

in #proposal4 years ago

Thanks for your comment.

No, I didn't support the proposal because I don't think it deserves any support. While I like the "curated newsletter" approach - and subscribe to quite some myself - I think this has most impact if off-site off chain. Then my question would be whether OP has the reach to get traction to such a concept.

Beyond that, while AFAIK no curation project has organized in a similar way, there are tools available for curators and those who go the distance will also be able to grow their curation power to make a difference. Especially considering that OP set out from a not-for-profit approach.

Personally, I only look for proposals which improve the chain, add critical/highly popular tools, or are aimed at user acquisition.

I found this proposal rather frivolous tbh. But "frivolous" meant in a jovial way. :)

Sort:  

Sory, but not understanding your abbreviations OP and AFAIK

@atma.love it never received a reply and you certainly know about it now, just like google can tell you, but let it be so for clarity:

AFAIK => As Far As I Know
OP => Original Poster, person who made the Original Post (which is also abbreviated OP by the way)

Thanks.

Posted via D.Buzz