If we compare SPK to youtube, how SPK is better? Let's just ignore the decentralization because we are all aware of that.
By the way, I hope your team working on the uploading thing and about a smaller MB. It's really hard to upload especially if the connection is slow. Just like me located in a province part of the Philippines. The usage of the internet in uploading is something.
We think that youtube will run on the SPK Network. 3Speak also runs on the SPK Network.
I mean, I want to upload videos first in the 3spk. I don't like to copy the links because my youtube channel was made only to be posted in hive chain. What I'm thinking or asking if 3spk can upload videos smoothly even though the Internet connection is not that fast, only if possible.
You will be able to upload from the desktop app to the network while being offline/or on an unstable internet connection. Over a relatively short period of time your video will be synced with the network and fully playable to others.
Let me be more specific on what I exactly mean here. One of the main issues with the current website is the inability to resume uploading in the event of an internet outage. Ideally, with the desktop app you would be able to encode, and compose your video completely offline (not publishing, and making live to the network until online). Once online the user can publish their content to hive and sync their video via ipfs to public dedicated nodes for high throughput playback. Ipfs allows us to tolerate unstable internet connections. There are definitely going to be users with bad internet connections, so higher throughput servers/other nodes will need to pick up the slack.