Yes, I agree with all of that. Great points. I want to support Matt's vision, and I think cryptomancer is great and has been a big part of why the game what it is. That said, I think these proposals go too far in the first step. A discussion should probably be had about options we have for moving forward with development, including where cryptomancer's expertise would be most impactful. If the Steem Monsters company is paying for it, then it's up to them. If the DAO is paying for it, I think we should have a larger say other than simply yes or no to a proposal like this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: